Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul: Less Lonely These Days
Townhall.com ^ | May 11, 2011 | John Stossel

Posted on 05/11/2011 5:19:28 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-258 next last
To: DJ MacWoW

Let me write slowly...

What does Christ have to do with “social” or “cultural”?


121 posted on 05/11/2011 10:11:23 AM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

Has nothing at all to do with homosexuality, homomarriage or the arguments they use to try and justify it.
Prove homosexuality is biologically the same as heteresexual pairing.

“Free association” doesn’t mean what you are trying to claim it does.


122 posted on 05/11/2011 10:13:34 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience; Ditter; little jeremiah; trisham; metmom; DJ MacWoW; BykrBayb; Darksheare; xzins; ..
I, wagglebee, believe the State has a duty to tell people who can associate with whom. I find the Constitutional principle of free association to be false and unchristian.

No troll, sodomites are free to associate with whomever they want, we are talking about them "marrying" each other.

Strange that you claim to be a Christian while pushing the homosexual agenda.

The Christian thing to do is tell the sodomites that they are sinning and call on them to repent, YOU want them to get married.

123 posted on 05/11/2011 10:15:00 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience
Everything. And we are back to my original post to you.

Look at your tagline and then tell me drugs should be legal. mommya admitted to being a social liberal. Square that with Christ, our Constitution and our nations Christian roots. And don’t forget homosexuality.

Let me put this more simply so you'll get it: Does Christ approve of believers supporting homosexuality, abortion and forcing others to support social programs? Does our Constitution support those things? Did the Founders support those things?

124 posted on 05/11/2011 10:21:51 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; the_conscience

I like how the conscience keeps trying to put words in your mouth.
And he has zero idea what free association means.
It has nothing to do with marriage.
By his logic, a man should be allowed to marry his goat , or pair off with horses, dogs, etc because it’s ‘free association’.
I’ve heard that free association crap used to support homosexuality before.
From a troll not too long ago.


125 posted on 05/11/2011 10:27:57 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW; Darksheare
Just so nobody gets the idea that the Founding Fathers were defenders of sodomy and would have embraced homosexual "marriage":

The Founders on Homosexuality

126 posted on 05/11/2011 10:29:53 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
Homosexuals have and have always had the EXACT SAME RIGHTS as every other American when it comes to marriage. There are NO LAWS that prohibit homosexuals from getting married and there never have been.
127 posted on 05/11/2011 10:31:38 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; Darksheare

Yup. And I have a link somewhere about Jefferson supporting castration for sodomites while he was Governor of Virginia. Unfortunately for sodomites, they kept the death penalty.


128 posted on 05/11/2011 10:32:25 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (America! The wolves are at your door! How will you answer the knock?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
I suspect that some of the pro-homosexual trolls who claim to be Christians are actually members of polygamist cults and view homosexual "marriage" as a step toward legalized polygamy.
129 posted on 05/11/2011 10:33:13 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: DJ MacWoW
That's mentioned in the thread I linked.
130 posted on 05/11/2011 10:35:33 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I know.
But don’t tell them that.
They’re busy trying to be an elevated protected class where the rest of us are forced and legislated to accept them in every inch of our lives and our childrens lives.
If free association ‘applies’ at all, then I am also free to NOT associate with them.


131 posted on 05/11/2011 10:35:39 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

NAMBLA types also push for homosexual marriage while pushing for lowering the age of consent.
They see it as an open door to their ‘wildest dreams’ and legal protection from prosecution.


132 posted on 05/11/2011 10:37:56 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

So the Constitutional principle of free association has something to do with biology?


133 posted on 05/11/2011 11:10:06 AM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience; Darksheare; Ditter; little jeremiah; trisham; metmom; DJ MacWoW; BykrBayb; xzins; ..
So the Constitutional principle of free association has something to do with biology?

Please explain where, exactly, in the Constitution you find the "right" for homosexuals to marry.

Do you also support the "right" to polygamy? If not, why is homosexual "marriage" acceptable and not polygamy?

What about marriage to farm animals? Do you support that as well? If not, why not.

Have you missed the numerous threads over the years where Jim Robinson has explicitly stated that Free Republic WILL NOT be used to further the homosexual agenda? Which is EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE DOING.

134 posted on 05/11/2011 11:15:42 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2718171/posts?page=125#125


135 posted on 05/11/2011 11:16:13 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; DJ MacWoW
No troll, sodomites are free to associate with whomever they want, we are talking about them "marrying" each other.

I'll try to write as clearly as I can so even you two can understand. I would not attend a Church which sanctioned homosexual marriage because marriage has spiritual implications and that's why it should remain something for each Church to decide. Now if two people of the same sex wish to contract with each other to share their possessions then our Constitution allows them to do that. Whatever they believe that contract entails spiritually is none of the State's concern.

The Christian thing to do is tell the sodomites that they are sinning and call on them to repent...

Of course that is the Christian thing to do but it is one thing to tell them and another thing to use the State to force them to comply.

136 posted on 05/11/2011 11:21:43 AM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

I’ll say it as plainly as I can:
Free association has NOTHING to do with marriage, homosexual or otherwise.
Got it?


137 posted on 05/11/2011 11:23:13 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare; DJ MacWoW

If free association has nothing to do with marriage I suppose you guys would support the State setting up forced marriages.

I get the feeling you guys would be comfortable in a Muslim country.


138 posted on 05/11/2011 11:27:36 AM PDT by the_conscience (We ought to obey God, rather than men. (Acts 5:29b))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience; Darksheare; Ditter; little jeremiah; trisham; metmom; DJ MacWoW; BykrBayb; xzins; ..
I'll try to write as clearly as I can so even you two can understand. I would not attend a Church which sanctioned homosexual marriage because marriage has spiritual implications and that's why it should remain something for each Church to decide. Now if two people of the same sex wish to contract with each other to share their possessions then our Constitution allows them to do that. Whatever they believe that contract entails spiritually is none of the State's concern.

Your clarity on this thread has never been an issue, the issue is your support of homosexual "marriage."

Of course that is the Christian thing to do but it is one thing to tell them and another thing to use the State to force them to comply.

Homosexuals have NEVER been barred from marriage, they have always had EXACTLY THE SAME RIGHTS as everyone else. YOU are trying to force the government to create "special rights" for homosexuals. YOU are coming right out of the left's playbook.

139 posted on 05/11/2011 11:27:49 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: the_conscience

Nice of you to try and put words in my mouth.
How about you prove that free association has something to do with marriage?
Show proof, show what the lw says on it.
Go ahead, I dare you.


140 posted on 05/11/2011 11:30:08 AM PDT by Darksheare (You will never defeat Bok Choy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 241-258 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson