The little engine that could!
Posted on 05/10/2011 9:34:15 PM PDT by RobinMasters
This horse is dead Jim.
Shouldn’t we talk about double digit unemployment, $5 gasoline, confused foreign policy, historic debt and hyper inflation?
Dead schmead...worth a listen!
Podcast The Peter Boyles Show - May 10, 2011 7am
WND.com publisher Joe Farah came on the show to talk about the latest birther issues.
Corsi, the loser, has a book to sell. It’s titled “Where’s the birth certificate,” but we now know where it is.
Obama screwed him and Farah royally!
Obama got played. The book is about the man called Obama’s lack of eligibility. The bc is just part of it.
Listen and learn...
Podcast The Peter Boyles Show - May 10, 2011 7am
WND.com publisher Joe Farah came on the show to talk about the latest birther issues.
3 tweedledees chime in from the Obama cheap seats.
Apparently they completed their work in scrubbing all references of NBC from Wikipedia and have been reassigned to FR re-education efforts.
Maybe the 9th circus being so liberal is a plus...they might have been given orders to get rid of Obama to save the Democratic Party, (their owners)..lol...wouldn’t that be something!
Whatever O’Reilly says is good enough for me. He says birthers are evil and the ‘folks’ know all that is good for them to know ‘cause he’s lookin’ out for the folks and Obozo is good folks.
Leftists want “meaningless elections”. Pelosi said as much.
They want the facade of legitimacy offered by elections while they continue their fascist “progression” in America.
after he is out of office wont fix NOW
Ich ben ein birther.
LOL
Ich ben ein birther.
Ich “bin” ein birther...
Yeah! They were in on the conspiracy when they passed the law in 1949, and amended it in 1977, 1991, 1997, and 2001. /s
It is a fact that many constitutional scholars would tell you that the definition of the term "natural born citizen" involves the citizenship status of the President (native born) as well as the citizehship status of one or both of his parents.I would like to hear any living "constitutional scholars" say #1 or #2. We've certainly heard constitutional scholars say that for native-born citizens, parentage is irrelevant. Why you think the last group "much smaller" is rather a mystery.1. Some say it requires that only one parent be a US citizen,
2. Others say it requires US citizenship of both parents.
3. Another much smaller group, perhaps including yourself, believes the parentage of the President is not involved at all.
I've asked this before, and the replies have been nonsense. They want to cite stuff from before U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, or arguments concerning people born before the 14'th Amendment, or non-scholars who never even stated an opinion on this until they needed reasons why Barack Obama cannot be president.
Maybe this time will be different. What constitutional scholars say #1 or #2?
It’s really simple.
Try to find someone, a professional who posted on youtube who can open up layers where there’s no chromatic aberration or distortion.
This is pieced together forgery, type on top of type.
No, stopped clocks are correct twice a day, as they say. It IS a good quote, and I wasn’t disparaging you or it. Bob
The original text of that article which, as of now can still be seen here, clearly indicates that the citizenship of both parents is a legitimate issue to consider when defining what we may regard as indisputably "natural born citizenship".
The same author later (when Obama's eligibility was increasingly disputed) back-tracked a bit, claiming that he wished he had merely mentioned one parent, but still I think he is an example of a living constitutional scholar that regards parental citizenship as relevant.
This was brought to my attention in great article on the NaturalBornCitizen blog here.
I learned about him on this very recent post on freerepublic.com.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.