Posted on 05/09/2011 2:22:33 PM PDT by Never A Dull Moment
"Obama used a Connecticut social security number for a number of years. His application to get it, apparently was fraudulent. Apparently this is a felony."
This is an interview of Susan Daniels, a licensed private investigator. Heres what she said,
1) This number (042684425) was issued in 1977 to Obama. It was originally given to someone born in 1890. He used it as a US Senator. 2) the application for this number is a forgery. 3) Ayers in one of his books bragged about how he could construct an identity for anyone. 4) to get this number one had to have a Connecticut address. Obama never lived in Connecticut. 5) She gave this information to people in power on both sides of the aisle and no one wanted to run with it. Nor would any public prosecutor. Even Limbaugh and Beck didnt follow up. 6) she has now given it to Donald Trump. 7) She also said his name was changed to Barry Soetoro and never changed back."
(Excerpt) Read more at israpundit.com ...
If you do, you will find most of them aren't true.
http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2010/05/17/fact-check-neil-sankey-barack-obama-27-numbers/
Your words....
I post an article because I find it interesting and feel others would, as well.
I enjoy the discourse in regard to an article I post because I know I will learn something new from many people. I appreciate their opinions, and find these opinions fascinating.
Wether or not an article is factual, or not, that is what I am here to learn. One thing that I have learned is that there are people who troll to try to deflect from an issue. What Daniels offers, I find very interesting.
I post an article because I find it interesting and feel others would, as well.
I enjoy the discourse in regard to an article I post because I know I will learn something new from many people. I appreciate their opinions, and find these opinions fascinating.
Wether or not an article is factual, or not, that is what I am here to learn. One thing that I have learned is that there are people who troll to try to deflect from an issue. What Daniels offers, I find very interesting.
Can’t get to the video. But the subject matter is true. Both parties and the judiciary are playing ostrich. It seems Neville Chamerlain and the opposing parties in Germany thought this would work. So did Thomas Moore with Henry the Eighth. It never works and the end is always bad. Somebody better step forward soon with enough fortitude to call them on it.
I would really like an answer to that as well
Thanks for posting, interesting to hear the investigator.
That was happening before they ran him for President.Four geoups of people knew everything there was to know about him. They were:1. the “movers and shakers” that sponsored him. 2.The Democrat Party. 3. The Republican Party. 4. The main stream media. All four groups were ordered to grease the skids for him and each group, in its own way, did.
Thank You. Sometimes we need that powerful reminder to bring the blood pressure back to normal.
Your post #24 squarely hit the mark.
I saw that link on another thread and found it intriguing. Especially in light of the fact that BHO has been tied to (1)Soros and global governance, (2) Iran and the development of a caliphate (3) Russia, communism, and the over-throw of America, and now (4) CIA.
While each of these scenarios present compelling arguments for each of their cases, they can’t all be true, and it is not even necessary that any of them are true!
I took the time to research out this site where this link appears, and discovered that it is a devout libertarian site which describes itself as “anti-state.” Another words, police, military, and yes, the CIA are all suspicious to the folks at this site.
Sadly, while this link is compelling and written by Wayne Madsen, when you go to his website to seek sources and a more complete understanding of why he draws these conclusions, you must be a member to read the other articles.
It is very difficult to determine original source information these days. So, each new slant needs to be evaluated thoroughly before it is accepted.
Does Obama work for the CIA? It is just as likely as any other theory that has been put forth. If he did, would that make him a good guy or would it make the CIA bad?
Just like the Osama Bin Laden thing...who knows? But he is no longer a problem, whatever befell him, and our military carried out their mission, whatever it was in detail, in a decisive fashion that we can be proud of.
It is very scary to not know the background of one in such a trusted position. Hidden agenda’s, whatever they are, by nature inspire distrust. I pray daily for our republic form of government. I hope others do as well.
There is a classic of black literature about a similar case: "Whoreson" by Donald Goines.
“Flush ‘em all.” Good idea. Now, just how do we do it, short or armed rebellion?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.