Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

BWAAAAHAHAHAHA, The donk trial lawyers are howling now in Texas.
1 posted on 05/09/2011 10:47:57 AM PDT by BradtotheBone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BradtotheBone

When they civil lawsuit are they saying single or collectively? Can no one individually sue?


2 posted on 05/09/2011 10:50:11 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Texas justice would improve if lawyers stopped contributing to judges’ campaigns before appearing in their courts. Elected judges in contested elections are a bad idea. Occasional elections where judges are retained is ok, keeps a slight check on their behavior. Jmo.


3 posted on 05/09/2011 10:52:44 AM PDT by Defiant (When Democrats lose voters, they manufacture new voters instead of convincing the existing voters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Texas...leading the way in REAL regulatory reform handicapping business.


4 posted on 05/09/2011 10:54:15 AM PDT by mo ("If you understand, no explanation is needed; if you do not, no explanation is possible")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
discourage people from bringing suits because of the fear of paying huge legal costs if they lose.

Well, DUH! Isn't that the whole point to the bill?
6 posted on 05/09/2011 10:57:02 AM PDT by 84rules ( Ooh-Rah! Semper Fi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

A nice little flame war started in the comments at the source.


7 posted on 05/09/2011 10:58:26 AM PDT by Professional Engineer (Conservative States of America has a nice ring to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
...but opponents say it would discourage people from bringing suits because of the fear of paying huge legal costs if they lose.

Yep. That's kinda the point.

8 posted on 05/09/2011 10:59:57 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
....but opponents say it would discourage people from bringing FRIVOLOUS and / or TRIVIAL suits because of the fear of paying huge legal costs if they lose at hitting the Courthouse lottery.
11 posted on 05/09/2011 11:21:25 AM PDT by Ron H. (Only Republicans can turn "snatching victory from the jaws of defeat" into an elevated art form!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
calls on the Texas Supreme Court to institute rules that make it tougher to bring a civil lawsuit and would also allow defendants to collect costs if they prevail

This is a double-edged sword to be sure. But it's long overdue. Trial Lawyers and scumbags filing frivolous lawsuits have brought us to this point. This situation has gone on for far too long. The legislatures have failed to address this problem. The down side is that some of those who have legitimate claims will not be able to proceed because a loss for them would be a financial catastrophe. Even if you have a valid claim you can still lose in civil court for any number of reasons. But this is the result of years of failure of the greedy lawyers bringing forth idiotic lawsuits and idiot jurors and insane verdicts.
12 posted on 05/09/2011 11:23:37 AM PDT by truthguy (Good intentions are not enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

One of the side benefits to this change will be less money flowing into the coffers of liberal Democrat legislators and judges. Look to Obama to try and stop this by using his henchman in charge of the AG office to attack it.


13 posted on 05/09/2011 11:28:45 AM PDT by Ron H. (Only Republicans can turn "snatching victory from the jaws of defeat" into an elevated art form!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone
...opponents say it would discourage people from bringing suits because of the fear of paying huge legal costs if they lose.

Hmm...how about trying this. Don't sue someone for an obscene amount of money unless you got the proof to win.

17 posted on 05/09/2011 12:44:31 PM PDT by LoneStarGI (Vegetarian: Old Indian word for "BAD HUNTER.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Would this apply to patents and the East Texas district? East Texas is the #1 location for filing patent suits nationwide. The juries there overwhelming favor plaintiffs in patent suits, so legal firms have learned to file their suits there regardless where the defendant is located.


19 posted on 05/09/2011 1:37:50 PM PDT by PastorBooks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BradtotheBone

Perhaps the lawyers will have to reduce their “huge legal fees” if they want continued business in the legal tort arena.


23 posted on 05/10/2011 4:25:14 AM PDT by mdmathis6 (Applied Christianity;a study in spiritual fiber optics connecting God's love to man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson