Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfman23601

When I say that, if they had 5 kids, that is net. That is including the many that would die as a fetus or prior to age 5.

However, even if you knock it down to 3 kids, it would still only take a little more than 1,000 years to do that exact same thing.

My point is that the bulk of the story is probably correct. Mathematically speaking, 70 people is a reasonable starting point for a population to start from.


30 posted on 05/08/2011 8:43:51 AM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

There might have been a lot more octo-moms back then, too.


31 posted on 05/08/2011 8:47:24 AM PDT by Krankor (And he's oh, so good, And he's oh, so fine, And he's oh, so healthy, In his body and his mind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

I agree, but it still discounts the Cherokee-Greek connection. I think there is in incredible story there.


36 posted on 05/08/2011 8:57:56 AM PDT by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson