Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Note the size of Reagan’s proposed anmesty: tiny in comparision with what a present day one would. For the first ten— fifteen years the immigrants had competition. That began to fall away around 1985 as the effects of the birth dearth began to be felt. Of course, one has to distinguish between pro and anti-birth people. Already by 1960, the Protestant Establishment and the main-line protestants had begun to abandon their earlier views on marriage and child-bearing. Back in the ‘50s there was a lot of talk about Catholics and the number of kids they had, especially when the Catholics were Mexicans. The mantra was: child-birth causes poverty, and the one-boy, one girl family begins to become the norm. The invention of the pill, though, was what began to knock the birth rate down and “necking”began to go out of fashion.


46 posted on 05/06/2011 4:15:52 PM PDT by RobbyS (Pray with the suffering souls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

By 1970 many of us were already being pushed out of jobs and housing by mexicans, I would say that Democrat policies were the most harmful and that most of the blame has to go to the Catholics that voted Democrat and gave us the Kennedys.

With no Kennedys, then we would still be America.


50 posted on 05/06/2011 4:49:56 PM PDT by ansel12 ( JIM DEMINT "I believe [Palins] done more for the Republican Party than anyone since Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson