You need to review the INS documents again. From August 1961 for several years afterward, Barak Sr pointedly did not represent to the feds that Barry II was his son. He did once, when his time was running out after four years or so, but "once" is not the same as "always." You need to stop defending this untenable position that "once" = "always" because it is false. The first time you posted that it may have been a mistake, but repeating it is a lie.
Please stop posting lies to FreeRepublic.com.
You need to review the INS documents again. From August 1961 for several years afterward, Barak Sr pointedly did not represent to the feds that Barry II was his son. He did once, when his time was running out after four years or so, but "once" is not the same as "always." You need to stop defending this untenable position that "once" = "always" because it is false. The first time you posted that it may have been a mistake, but repeating it is a lie.Please stop posting lies to FreeRepublic.com.
In other words, you have no evidence whatsoever to demonstrate Barack Hussein Obama I overtly and explicitly denied being the father of Barack Hussein Obama II at the time the child was born and natural born British citizenship was established by law. So, where is the evidence you have for this "once" you are claiming? What is the name of the document, and what is the quotation of what it had to say?