Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Plummz
.... remains false. Just admit your mistake. Your strident blatherings only reveal yourself as someone willing to lie. A shame.

Produce the court order which changed the father of the child at birth from Barack Hussein Obama I to someone else, or produce the court document in which Barack Hussein Obama I ever denied being the father of the child. Otherwise, Barack Hussein Obama I was always the legal father of the child at birth, just as he acknowledged in interviews with the INS, divorce proceedings, and his visit to his son and his son's school.

LIBEL FOR DIVORCE [….] That one child has been born to said Libellant and Libellee as issue of said marriage, to wit: BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, a son, born August 4, 1961

DECREE OF DIVORCE[...]IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Libellant be and also is hereby granted the care, custody and control of BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II the minor child of the parties hereunto, with the right of reasonable visitation in the Libellee, and further that the question of child support is specifically reserved until raised hereafter by Libellant.

Oh yeah, you can't and won't, because it does not exist...go figure. You'd rather invent fairy tales to make the eligibility issue falsely appear to be the hobby horse of "nutjobs", instead of the genuine Constitutional crisis it truly represents.

345 posted on 05/14/2011 11:26:51 PM PDT by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 343 | View Replies ]


To: WhiskeyX

You should really apologize for all of your distasteful lies.


346 posted on 05/15/2011 10:35:43 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson