The divorce papers indicate he was the father of the child from the viewpoint of the government of the State of Hawaii. I see no court case in which a decision and court order was issued to recognize someone else as the father whose citizenship would have determined the natural born citizenship of the child. Even if it is somehow demonstrated in the future that Lolo Soetoro was a court ordered adoptive stepfather as often suspected because of family statements, court documents, and other documents; any subsequent allegiance and naturalized citizenship in Indonesia or elsewhere would do nothing to change the child's natural born allegiance to Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom of Great Britain resulting from the legal documents identifying the father at birth as Barack Hussein Obama I.
I see no legal document in which Barack Hussein Obama I denied being the father of the child, but I do see legal documents in which he did not dispute being the father of the child. You can forget about trying to spin and dodge and throwing around careless and false accusations of lies to obfuscate your own comments. Come up with a legal document in which Barack Hussein Obama I refuted the legal documents and his own comments to the INS and other authorities by declaring to a court or other competent legal authority something to the effect of "I am not the father of Barack Hussein Obama I." Otherwise, the comment that he always claimed to be the father of his son must stand upon the basis of the divorce records, Immigration and Naturalization Service records, and other authoritative government records that actually control such a status.
As for your stridently false accusations....let's just charitably say they do you no credit.
.... remains false. Just admit your mistake. Your strident blatherings only reveal yourself as someone willing to lie. A shame.