Sorry if me having fun at your expense upset your delicate sensibilities.
EAT CROW AND LIKE IT!
You must like it, it is all I am serving here, and you keep coming back for more!
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/265767/pdf-layers-obamas-birth-certificate-nathan-goulding
You’re a stinking coward. Rebut the points made on the link.
National Review didn't prove anything. Goulding didn't prove squat. You don't use some optimization feature on a magazine cover that did not even OCR the words and lettering (it didn't work on his "demonstration") on the cover dominated by picture. You would not even use that in the first place. If Goulding wanted to prove his point, he should have shown us all the step-by-step process that rendered exactly the same as Obama's alleged COLB by using the same flattened document. And he should have shown the process to everyone so that it can be duplicated by others. Goulding threw some BS out and you guys swallowed it. The pdf reader didn't even build the pdf document in the same manner as Obama's new COLB. It doesn't even come close. It renders the document in sections including the words that even fade in, and NOT like the the background that was rendered first with the rectangular white spaces that Obama's COLB was built before the additional layers of words and letters that were added later.
Goulding's nonsense demonstration:
http://global.nationalreview.com/pdf/passport2.pdf
Obama's new COLB:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf
They are completely dissimilar in the way the pdf files are built.