Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amnesty International: Questions around operation against Osama bin Laden
Amnesty International ^ | May 04 2011

Posted on 05/06/2011 3:34:46 AM PDT by knighthawk

Amnesty International today asked the US and Pakistani authorities to clarify aspects of the operation in Abbottabad in which Osama bin Laden was killed.

The organization specifically requested information on the status and whereabouts of those who were with bin Laden and the circumstances of his killing.

“We are seeking information from the US and Pakistani authorities about how many people were in the compound at the time of the operation, what happened to them and specifically what is the status and current whereabouts of the survivors,” said Claudio Cordone, Senior Director at Amnesty International.

According to reports attributed to Pakistani intelligence officials, 18 people were in bin Laden’s compound at the time of the US attack.

US officials have said that five people were killed and two women were injured – one of whom was identified as bin Laden’s wife – and that at the end of the operation the injured women were left at the compound along with at least six children.

CIA Director Leon Panetta said on 3 May that US forces had full authority to kill Osama bin Laden but that they were to capture him if he had surrendered.

The White House has said that Osama Bin Laden was unarmed but resisted capture.

“Given that he was not armed, it is not clear how he resisted arrest and whether an attempt was made to capture him rather than kill him,” said Claudio Cordone.

“Amnesty International believes that US forces should have attempted to capture Osama bin Laden alive in order to bring him to trial if he was unarmed and posing no immediate threat.”

Osama bin Laden claimed responsibility for acts of terrorism amounting to crimes against humanity and has inspired others to commit similar acts. Perpetrators of such acts must be brought to justice in a manner consistent with international law.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: amnesty; amnestyintl; barf; binladen; holder; internationallaw; osama

1 posted on 05/06/2011 3:34:50 AM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Amnesty International thinks the SEALs should have tucked bin Laden into bed with a mint on his pillow.


2 posted on 05/06/2011 3:37:55 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; Turk2; keri; ...

Ping


3 posted on 05/06/2011 3:38:26 AM PDT by knighthawk (We will always remember We will always be proud We will always be prepared so we may always be free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I was wondering how long it would take before these clowns put their two cents into the pot.


4 posted on 05/06/2011 3:38:38 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
“Amnesty International believes that US forces should have attempted to capture Osama bin Laden alive in order to bring him to trial if he was unarmed and posing no immediate threat.”

Amnesty International and hundreds of other liberal groups are deeply saddened at the loss of fundraising opportunities by not having a bin Laden trial.

5 posted on 05/06/2011 3:39:21 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Yeah, the SEALs will be getting all of that to them ASAP.


6 posted on 05/06/2011 3:39:38 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

Just an odd question...during the seven days after 9-11....what exactly did Amnesty International put out as a statement then? I’m suspecting...nothing. If I’m right....that speaks volumes for the organization.


7 posted on 05/06/2011 3:44:22 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Let’s cut to the chase here, fellas, Was he read his Miranda Rights before or after he was shot? And will there an estate sale so the U.S can recoup a few bucks against the cost of taking him out?

That’s what I want to know.


8 posted on 05/06/2011 3:44:32 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Amnesty International DECLARES "We support Osama".


9 posted on 05/06/2011 3:56:43 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Yeah Amnesty Int’l, we’ll get right on it and clarify it for you...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pBcNpXmr-Ps


10 posted on 05/06/2011 4:02:15 AM PDT by rbmillerjr (Murdering unborn children is the highest sacrament in the liberal religion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

To Shamnesty International ... the short answer is that if we tell you, we’ll have to kill you too. STFU!


11 posted on 05/06/2011 4:16:33 AM PDT by Babalu ("Tracer rounds work both ways ...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

This does open up a prairie fire on Obama’s left, though.


12 posted on 05/06/2011 4:21:56 AM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (FreeRepublic's frontline citizen reporter in Japan (among others). -- AiT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

They were busy tracking Daniel Pearl’s killers


13 posted on 05/06/2011 4:22:06 AM PDT by SMARTY (Conforming to non-conformity is conforming just the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
CIA Director Leon Panetta said on 3 May that US forces had full authority to kill Osama bin Laden but that they were to capture him if he had surrendered.

Oh Leon. Sometimes you just crack me up.

But 'series', props to you for doing the job that had to be done.

14 posted on 05/06/2011 4:27:06 AM PDT by Condor51 (The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits [A.Einstein])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

I take it they would have preferred a missile leaving all dead in the building and surrounding area? Would have been fine by me.


15 posted on 05/06/2011 4:27:18 AM PDT by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Should the Government
Be permitted to kill the
Inconvenient?

Don’t answer too quick...
The day may come when you are
Inconvenient...


16 posted on 05/06/2011 4:45:28 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (If you can read this / (To paraphrase on old line) / Thank a TAXPAYER!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

The communists and the anarchists woke up I see.

LLS


17 posted on 05/06/2011 4:46:19 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (THANK YOU PRESIDENT BUSH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk

Amnesty International today asked the US and Pakistani authorities to clarify aspects of the operation

Hey Amnesty International, I got something you can clarify...
Bunch of assclowns............


18 posted on 05/06/2011 4:58:20 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Amnesty International should have entered the compound and talked bin Laden into turning himself in.
19 posted on 05/06/2011 5:42:26 AM PDT by Realman30 ("I've already made a donation to Haiti. It's called taxes". . . . El Rushbo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson