Skip to comments.
Swedish Skeptics Confirm "Nuclear Process" in Tiny 4.7 kW Reactor (Rossi E-cat)
Renewable Energy World ^
| 5.5.11
| Thomas Blakeslee
Posted on 05/05/2011 7:47:16 AM PDT by Free Vulcan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Long and a couple of days old but interesting.
To: Free Vulcan
Not only cheap to run, but it always gets me to the office on time.
To: Free Vulcan
Hmmmm, Nickel Futures....
To: Free Vulcan
how cheap is nickel? I read that a nickel coin (1945-2011) contains 7 cents of nickel. (pre-1945 is silver and worth $2+ ? )
To: Free Vulcan
Thanks for posting this. Although I am completely unqualified to weigh in on the scientific aspects of this, what did catch my attention was the use of nickel. It seems like demand for it could increase significantly in the years ahead if this pans out (along with even the even more significant, game-changing aspects of the energy equation.)
5
posted on
05/05/2011 7:57:05 AM PDT
by
rpierce
(We have taglines now? :)
To: Free Vulcan
I found an article
"Special report: cold fusion is neither", which discusses a theory behind what's really happening in the e-cat, in case anybody's interested. In a nutshell, the theory is that a sufficiently intense electric field can cause a reverse beta decay (electron merging with proton to form neutron), with the resulting neutron having sufficiently low momentum to be readily absorbed by a nickel nucleus, forming an unstable isotope which decays into copper.
I'm still trying to digest the physics discussed in it, with side-trips into surface plasmon and the BornOppenheimer approximation
6
posted on
05/05/2011 7:59:51 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: The Free Engineer
"One word...Nickel"
7
posted on
05/05/2011 8:01:15 AM PDT
by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
To: Free Vulcan
As gramps used to say, “don’t take any wooden nickels boy.”
8
posted on
05/05/2011 8:05:33 AM PDT
by
dblshot
(Insanity - electing the same people over and over and expecting different results.)
To: Free Vulcan
writer needs to read up the difference between kW & kWh.
9
posted on
05/05/2011 8:06:10 AM PDT
by
Christian Engineer Mass
(25ish Cambridge MA grad student. Many conservative Christians my age out there? __ Click my name)
To: rpierce; rokkitapps
The
market price of nickel is $27K per ton, or $13 bucks per pound. An e-cat, in 50 cubic cm, holds well under a pound. A unit producing 4.7kw of energy for 6 months is about 20,000 kWh. At $0.10/kWh, that's $2K worth of energy from under $13 worth of nickel.
10
posted on
05/05/2011 8:11:28 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
To: PapaBear3625
Bump. That’s good because it gets us away from the cold fusion label.
11
posted on
05/05/2011 8:12:11 AM PDT
by
Free Vulcan
(Vote Republican! You can vote Democrat when you're dead.)
To: Free Vulcan
But using Nickel as a fuel will eventually require the mining of it in outer space as it is somewhat rare here on earth....
12
posted on
05/05/2011 8:12:16 AM PDT
by
GraceG
To: Free Vulcan
Four words: Silver, sell at 48.
13
posted on
05/05/2011 8:13:10 AM PDT
by
Sawdring
To: Christian Engineer Mass
writer needs to read up the difference between kW & kWh Would you point to the mistake? I haven't found it and I certainly understand the difference.
14
posted on
05/05/2011 8:14:23 AM PDT
by
thackney
(life is fragile, handle with prayer (biblein90days.org))
To: PapaBear3625
One analysis I read basically said that the amount of nickel required for global application of the E-cat is trivial compared to the annual supply of nickel already being used. In other words, don't bother buying nickel in the expectation that demand for it will surge.
I posted another thread this morning of Ny Technik's latest take on the E-Cat. The author was able to pick up and inspect the E-cats (thus ruling out hidden wires, etc.), and checked for electromagnetic radiation to be sure power was not being 'beamed' into the device by some method. It's getting much harder to be skeptical about this thing.
15
posted on
05/05/2011 8:15:14 AM PDT
by
Liberty1970
(Liberty, not License. Freedom, not Slavery.)
To: Free Vulcan
very interesting.
i’ll take 5
16
posted on
05/05/2011 8:16:16 AM PDT
by
sten
(fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
To: Liberty1970
17
posted on
05/05/2011 8:17:06 AM PDT
by
Liberty1970
(Liberty, not License. Freedom, not Slavery.)
To: Free Vulcan; cripplecreek; Windflier; dirtboy; backwoods-engineer; Errant; Moonman62; ...
18
posted on
05/05/2011 8:17:39 AM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Heck? Geewhiz Cripes, thats the place where people who don't believe in Gosh think they aint going.)
To: Free Vulcan
One of these tiny reactors could be used to power a wind turbine when the wind is calm
19
posted on
05/05/2011 8:20:52 AM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. N.C. D.E. +12 ....( History is a process, not an event ))
To: Liberty1970
One analysis I read basically said that the amount of nickel required for global application of the E-cat is trivial compared to the annual supply of nickel already being used. World nickel production is 1.6 million tons per year. That's a lot of nickel. E-cat usage would not be a blip on the radar.
20
posted on
05/05/2011 8:24:38 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson