Out of curiosity, why dig up an article that was written in 2009? Has something changed?
“WHITE HOUSE: WE AREN’T RELEASING A BIN LADEN PHOTO”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2714949/posts
Yes, something has changed. All of a sudden its VERY relevant, while the white hut won't release photos of the supposed taking down of muslim kindred-to-zer0, OBL.
Because Obama thought it was perfectly fine to release 2000 photos of “prisoner abuse” at Guantanamo but just decided it would be disrespectful to release 1 OBL death photo. At least he kept his “stand with the Muslims” promise. I’ll bet he’s even penned a letter to the MB explaining that Panetta did it.