Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
A 2 year old article should not be posted here without the op explaining its not current. Most people don’t bother to read the date on the article.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Oh, yeah, but not one picture showing the mastermind behind all of this!
Freakin’ morons!
32 posted on
05/04/2011 11:14:55 AM PDT by
luvie
(GOP? You need to fight like a GIRL!!~~Sarah Palin)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
D’oh, completely forgot about that and the Holder CIA probe.
How in the world can we have elected this person?
34 posted on
05/04/2011 11:17:18 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Is he getting even for his buddy Osama ?
36 posted on
05/04/2011 11:26:39 AM PDT by
RnMomof7
To: Oldeconomybuyer
37 posted on
05/04/2011 11:26:46 AM PDT by
rhombus
To: Oldeconomybuyer
39 posted on
05/04/2011 11:36:58 AM PDT by
mnehring
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Some people need some reading comprehension here. This is a 2009 article about photos that were never released.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Rush just mentioned this headline. You HAVE to know he has a FReeper account and scans posts/threads during the day.
41 posted on
05/04/2011 12:04:46 PM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bacon Akbar!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
HMMM? Since the reason for not releasing the Bin Laden photos are about not inflaming the arab street this seems to really to fly in the face of that!
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Looky Looky....not concerned about inflaming Muslim sensitivities.
Good show, Oldeconomybuyer.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
