[RavenATB]

Not so. You have to assume that the SEALs were capable of making a 100 percent positive ID of OBL in the field for them to be lying.

[Hulka]

Not what I said.

I said: “3) They are reporting what they have been told by the SEALS. (Interesting you would call the SEALs liars.)”

The question was why the conflicting initial reports.

I answered with the most plausible reasons, too include what the SEALS reported.

WH press conferences and news reports were not done until after verification by DNA, among other means (visual ID by on-site SEALS, wife's ID, facial matching technology, etc).

So, SEALS made the ID and were right. They were 100% accurate.