The State of Hawaii has vouched for the document and its provenance. Why would it do so? And why couldn't a clean copy have been made, rather than this horrible PDF which clearly is made up of separate parts, parts that show technical anomalies and anachronisms?
Be it as it may, the Kenyan usurper has admitted to Kenyan citizenship, and indeed, this dubious document vouches for such dual citizenship. That puts a cloud over his claim of natural born citizenship. That cloud must be cleared, and it can only be done by the production of all passports and visas; clearly, it would be best if a cleaner copy of the natal records could be found, but it appears to me that we won't get anything better than this highly dubious PDF.
Have they ? They vouched that they sent him a document but have they vouched for what he posted online ?