The stockholders hired him and are responsible for his actions.. else "they" would/should fire him..
The stockholders in America hired an in your face Marxist as President..
They need to fire him -OR- allow him to loot and dismantle a profitable business..
If only it were that easy. I remember years ago when AT&T was fighting with its union so the union was trying to get one of their members elected to the BOD. They found out that if every member and everyone every member knew who owned stock voted their shares it wouldn't even make a dent compared to the stock that was still controlled by the company. The directors were hand picked and approved by the company and nobody was going to change that. Those hand-picked members also controlled compensation and were themselves well compensated for their time. So you are talking about a fair world as opposed to the real one where the game is rigged.
As for your American stockholders, how easy do you think it would be to get the Marxist off the ticket even if his own party members saw him as a liability? How did we get McCain in 2008 when there were others clearly more qualified? The "stockholders" were only given the choice of rubberstamping the picked candidate or sitting it out. Again, the game was rigged and there wasn't a thing you could do about it.