More Big and Little Pixels (Simple Picture Shows Obama BC is Bogus

May 2, 2011 | ML/NJ

[Ladysforest]

ping

[LucyT]

More Big and Little Pixels (Simple Picture Shows 0bama BC is Bogus)

Addendum.

"When one examines the signatures on the 0bama abstract, why is it that instead of the 1961 era black ink business pen in a thin crisp signature, that instead the signatures are velvet smooth and wide like a felt tip pen of a much later date........... as those pens and ink structure gels did not appear until..."

"It is not the same font, but the same pen which is questionable on three different signatures and dates."

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/05/barack-hawaiian-obama.html

. . . . # 5 , too. .

[LucyT]

.

Ping.

Check out article, and # 22.

.

[little jeremiah]

If Bin Laden is dead, who knows for how long. His corpse (if he’s dead) could have been on ice waiting for the right moment to distract attention from whatever Zero didn’t want attention on.

[Faith]

“When one examines the signatures on the 0bama abstract, why is it that instead of the 1961 era black ink business pen in a thin crisp signature, that instead the signatures are velvet smooth and wide like a felt tip pen of a much later date........... as those pens and ink structure gels did not appear until...”

---

LC raises a valid question regarding the type of pen(s) used on the signature lines. Felt tips were not around in the early 60’s.

In 1966 Papermate added the Flair Pen, which later was known as Tempo and Nylon.

http://www.ehow.com/facts_4912476_history-papermate-pens.html

[Faith]

His corpse (if he’s dead) could have been on ice waiting for the right moment to distract attention from whatever Zero didn’t want attention on.

Timing is everything, isn't it? I share your suspicions.

[little jeremiah]

Everything lately reminds me of Germany in the late ‘30s.

[azishot]

When one examines the signatures on the Obama abstract, why is it that instead of the 1961 era black ink business pen in a thin crisp signature, that instead the signatures are velvet smooth and wide like a felt tip pen of a much later date...

Now THAT'S interesting. Seems like the forgers(s) left another clue.

[hoosiermama]

SO, what is happening the the Ninth circus Court case that was scheduled to hear arguments today?

[Portcall24]

It is amazing how easily the vast majority of this great Country is distracted from what’s important.

[ml/nj]

Everything lately reminds me of Germany in the late ‘30s.

Me too.

Which is sort of scary because my fathers' family was fro Berlin. My grandmother recognized what was going on and began to plan their escape in 1936. Her blood courses through my veins.

ML/NJ

[kjo]

The point in hitting Osama now was to wag the dog. This blows the birth issue off the front pages...and now that the MSM says the LFBC is the real deal...it is time to move on...don’t you get it?

Nothing to see here.

[little jeremiah]

My DH’s father was enslaved by the Nazis in a munitions factory, when he was 17. DH’s grandfather made and fixed weapons for the Polish partisans. Hub grew up with these stories, and machine gun bullet holes in the house he grew up in.

[justiceseeker93]

Since Dr. Sinclair’s widow is currently working in connection with the Hawaii DOH, it would make sense that the doctor’s signature came from a document in his widow’s possession; in other words, it came from a source different than Dunham’s signature. Hence the need of the forgers to piece together the document from different sources and some telltale signs of that.

[justiceseeker93]

Nothing to see here.

Surely you jest.

[CanaGuy]

I see nothing strange about the pen/ink/line-weight in Ann Dunham Obama's signature.

Looking at the "O" and "b" in "Obama" you can see a line weight variation depending on where the pen was during her stroke in forming the letters. This line weight change implies to me that she most likely used an actual nib-style pen with liquid ink. At that time, it would probably have been an "ink cartridge" type pen with a slightly squared nib to get that line width variation. She was probably right-handed to achieve those precise effects in forming the letters I mentioned.

In the early 60's, there was a HUGE variety of ink pen nib styles to choose from...wide, narrow, squared, round, ball, etc., depending on your calligraphy talents.

Also, in those times, many people still envied being able to get that "fat-then-thin" character style, because it harked back to even earlier times when a fine, "Spencerian hand" was much admired and strictly taught in schools ....with an inkwell in every desk. She was probably taught to write that way, as I was, dipping a pen into an inkwell.

Nope. I see nothing wrong with the pen/ink/line-weight style, IMHO.

HOWEVER, whether it's Ann's signature, or whether she actually signed that particular page, at that particular date.....well, that's the big question, isn't it?

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks justiceseeker93.

[Dajjal]

obumpa

[jarofants]

A Newbie!!!

[Gene Eric]

I think the truth can be found in the differing serifs of the 1 digits in the serial number. But what the hell do I know, “I’m just a balding, middle-aged white guy that hates health care reform”.