[PeteCat]

“Indians and Invaders: The Citizenship Clause and Illegal Aliens” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (3): 509. March 2008.

http://www.law.upenn.edu/journals/conlaw/articles/volume10/issue3/Magliocca10U.Pa.J.Const.L.499%282008%29.pdf

“From Feudalism to Consent: Rethinking Birthright Citizenship” Legal Memorandum No. 18 (Washington D.C.: Heritage Foundation):

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2006/03/From-Feudalism-to-Consent-Rethinking-Birthright-Citizenship

[philman_36]

Both of those articles, IMO, are worthless because they both deal with naturalization. A search of "natural" brings up very few to no ties to "born". If they don't speak about "natural born" citizenship why would a person wanting to learn more about that subject read an article that doesn't cover it?
The second article, however, has a good critique of United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

Just my opinion.