Honest? I have heard numerous times that footprints will match or not match, whether from an adult or child.
All I”m saying is there is one document - fraud or not - that has a purported footprint of Zero. If the hospital/s wherein he was supposedly born did the souvenir baby footprint thing, and his adult footprint was matched to the Mombasa doc and any that HI might have someplace, it would be interesting.
How is this dishonesty? Come on.
An unidentified “police dermatoglyphist” examined the footprints. This print identification expert found 89 percent to be technically inadequate for identification purposes, with only 1 percent possessing sufficient ridge detail for positive identification. The article concluded by stating that the typical health care professional is not fully aware of “...how unreliable footprints of a newborn happen to be for purposes of identification.”1 In a 1988 publication, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) stated that “...individual hospitals may want to continue the practice of footprinting or fingerprinting, but universal use of this practice is no longer recommended.
http://www.peoplefindernow.com/infanprts.htm
What would you do - have Obama step on an inkpad and then on a piece of paper? Really?