Deninger is of course correct that the thing ‘released’ by barry bassturd’s minions is a composit and not a photocpy of an actual paper document. Deninger also notes that Hawaii has vouched for this fraudulent ‘release’. Therefore what was shown to the public has now become either the official Hawaii source data, or the most blatant insult/in your face/piss on the American people for questioning bassturd’s credulity/I won so I can do as I please, laws be damned. Frankly, the amatuerish state of the forgery tells me it is the latter ... We The People have been shown in no uncertain terms that the law we think exists, only applies to we peons not to the democrat oligarchs and their feckless Pubby enablers.
Agree.
Folks, pay attention: Just as Watergate was about the cover-up not a botched burglary, this story is now about the creation of an official document that was presented to the American public as if it were something it is not.
My theory is that the original paper BC was destroyed long ago when vital records were microfilmed. That film contains the image of the “curl” of the paper in the book, and whatever was originally typed or written on the form. The microfilm was later destroyed when vital records moved to digital form, so now all we have is a scan of a microfilm of a piece of paper. In other words, an electronic image that has no “provenance” or proof that it is what it purports to be.
This is just a theory but it makes sense. What does not make sense is why anyone would accept what the WH put out as anything more authentic than what any Photoshop user creates every day.