What we have are lies...not forgeries.
It would be a forgery if:
1. Obama handed you a document as generated by the DOH of Hawaii - not a copy thereof - but the actual document created by the DOH when created.
2. It contained the actual embossed, dated and signed seal.
3. It appears to be alterated, abnormal, “fishy”.
4. You convince a judge of #3.
5. The judge subpoenas the DOH of Hawaii to open the sealed record in court for comparison purpose.
6. And it turns out the two do match and confirming a forgery.
Then you have established a forgery!
All we have now are simple lies -
I’ve already predicted on several threads that Obama being very slick will never present the actual embossed seal containing DOH generated copy as-is (assuming they do) because he will have to alter it to have it say what he wants it to say - thereby putting himself in legal jeopardy.
He will always present a copy of or a scan of that will not meet certification requirements and rely on the media to assist him in maintaining his lie.
=8-)
6. [do NOT match]
(correction)
=8-)