Skip to comments.
Michele Bachmann's platform (should she choose to run)
c-span ^
| April 29, 2011
Posted on 04/30/2011 8:02:58 AM PDT by ejdrapes
Michele Bachmann spoke at the Americans for Prosperity Forum in New Hampshire (along with Tim Pawlenty, Mitt Romney, Herman Cain and Rick Santorum). From her speech you get a good idea of what Bachmann's campaign would be should she choose to run.
- 25% cut in federal discretionary spending
- Cancel outstanding stiumulus; return repaid TARP funds to US Treasury
- Reinstate 1994 welfare reform act with 5 year lifetime cap
- A balanced budget with no tax increases and no spending increases outside of population growth + inflation
- Federal government would send letter to every state announcing it will not bail out any underfunded public employee union pension or healthcare plan
- Would do the same for private business (union and non-union); no more federal bailouts
- No more federal ownership of private business - put Fannie and Freddie on the auction block; end future federally backed mortgage securities
- Sell government share in AIG, Chrysler, GM, Bank of America and Citibank
- Legalize private student lending, end federal government involvement in student loan business
- Repeal Obamacare; allow Americans to purchase any healthcare policy they want from any state with no minimum mandates using tax free dollars and fully deductable on tax returns; tort reform
- Downsize EPA; no cap & trade; legalize all American energy production, all without federal subsidy
- Cut business tax rate to 9%
- No capital gains tax, no inheritance tax, no alternative minimum tax
- No marginal income tax rate would be higher than 20%
- Implement a national consumption or flat tax
- Pass a mother of all repeal bills to repeal the last 4 years of Obama/Pelosi/Reid
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: americans4prosperity; kochbrothers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
For as much as Bachmann is painted as a radical or extreme she comes across to me as about as policy wonkish as anyone in the GOP. What other candidate or possible candidate is talking with this much specificity? This is what we need. I'd love Bachmann to get in. Even if she doesn't have a chinaman's chance in hell if this is where she forces the debate to go, if these are the issues she forces all GOP candidates to talk about and take positions on that is a good thing. And who knows what might happen. If a nobody like Obama can make it to the white house anyone can.
1
posted on
04/30/2011 8:03:00 AM PDT
by
ejdrapes
To: ejdrapes
Extreme = anyone who does not adopt a far left position.
We need extreme.
2
posted on
04/30/2011 8:04:16 AM PDT
by
ilgipper
To: ejdrapes
Works for me. Now if only Mrs Bachmann would officially get it the hunt.
3
posted on
04/30/2011 8:07:15 AM PDT
by
jla
To: ejdrapes
4
posted on
04/30/2011 8:11:33 AM PDT
by
impimp
To: ejdrapes
That list paints with a very broad brush. But, like you said, it’s the most complete platform put forward so far. May this serve as a kick in the ass to the other candidates!
Michele BUMP. Plain talk. Straight talk.
5
posted on
04/30/2011 8:12:00 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Think you know hardship? Wait till the dollar is no longer the world's reserve currency.)
To: ejdrapes
This is a good start, but only a start. There must also be cuts in non-discretionary spending, protection of the border etc. If she runs, she has my support.
6
posted on
04/30/2011 8:14:07 AM PDT
by
DaveyB
(Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. -John Adams)
To: ejdrapes
I ADORE this woman.
Bachmann/Cain 2012!
7
posted on
04/30/2011 8:17:48 AM PDT
by
Grunthor
(The man or woman who doesn't forgive has forgotten the price that Christ paid for them on the Cross.)
To: ejdrapes
To: upchuck
This list will not comply with the GOP rules of engagement.
9
posted on
04/30/2011 8:22:28 AM PDT
by
screaminsunshine
(Shut up and eat your Beans!)
Comment #10 Removed by Moderator
To: ejdrapes
11
posted on
04/30/2011 8:23:43 AM PDT
by
CheezyD
To: ejdrapes
What other candidate or possible candidate is talking with this much specificity?
None that I have see so far. Most of the other candidates are dealing in sound bites and platitudes.
12
posted on
04/30/2011 8:29:00 AM PDT
by
rob777
To: ejdrapes
She needs to say something about borders and illegal immigration. Probably already has.
13
posted on
04/30/2011 8:38:45 AM PDT
by
VRW Conspirator
(Pray like it all depends on God. Shoot like it all depends on you.)
To: VRW Conspirator
I hope she does. I haven't heard her speak about it that much. I wish she'd get asked about it because I'd love to know her views.
14
posted on
04/30/2011 8:41:56 AM PDT
by
ejdrapes
("Trump is NO conservative." - Jim Robinson)
To: rob777
In this forum in NH Bachamm also said we need to deal with balancing our budget THIS year. That's quite bold. I'm not even sure if the RSC put out a balanced budget. But I'd still rather have someone be bold and not get everything they want than be timid and have the same result (and yes I'm referring to John Boehner here).
15
posted on
04/30/2011 8:44:32 AM PDT
by
ejdrapes
("Trump is NO conservative." - Jim Robinson)
To: ejdrapes
*Drill, baby, drill.
16
posted on
04/30/2011 8:46:26 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: ejdrapes
25% cut in federal discretionary spending (or 38 Billion).
17
posted on
04/30/2011 8:46:41 AM PDT
by
Errant
To: ejdrapes
I hope she does. I haven't heard her speak about it[borders/immigration] that much. It is a wedge issue. Whe approximately 75% of America wants illegal immigration stopped and the borders secured, a candidate MUST comedown on the issue. It is a win-win for someone like Bachman and lose-lose for the Dems.
18
posted on
04/30/2011 8:52:25 AM PDT
by
VRW Conspirator
(Pray like it all depends on God. Shoot like it all depends on you.)
To: ejdrapes
She already has a job to do in congress. Couldn’t she possibly spend a little time on that? She certainly hasn’t done very much to get Boehner in line or to fight the constant cave-ins taking place in congress—again.
That’s what she was elected for, and instead she’s running around smiling at the cameras and completely neglecting her job.
Her campaign has been bugging me with phone calls the past couple of days, because I donated last year to support her for congress. I just told them I don’t take phone solicitations, and I’m wondering if I made a mistake donating to her congressional campaign.
19
posted on
04/30/2011 8:54:46 AM PDT
by
Cicero
To: ejdrapes
This is awesome. Looks like a Maggie Thatcher platform. Its what the economy needs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson