Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; Lancey Howard; Travis McGee

Thanks for the ping, PM. I’d heard about the murders, but this is the first I ever heard of troops not allowed to have rounds for their weapons.

My s-i-l just returned home from Afghan on about Wednesday after a year away. I’ll check with him and see if this was normal or unique to a given location.

I know in training missions our units were often required to have weapons without rounds in quarters areas for obvious safety reasons, but that would not entail in a combat zone.

There’s also the issue of whether they could have magazines but not have them in their weapons when in a FOB. I can sorta get my mind around that, but I think out of 9 killed that someone could have locked and loaded in that amount of time and returned fire.


88 posted on 04/30/2011 8:18:10 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
I know in training missions our units were often required to have weapons without rounds in quarters areas for obvious safety reasons, but that would not entail in a combat zone.

Nowadays, airports, base mess halls, and CIA compounds are "combat zones". Somebody needs to be locked and loaded at all times. Telling trained military men they can't have bullets is malicious stupidity.

137 posted on 04/30/2011 11:00:59 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson