Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duchess of Cambridge ‘wants to visit New Zealand’
Times of India ^ | 04.30.11

Posted on 04/30/2011 6:35:32 AM PDT by Perdogg

The Duchess of Cambridge Kate Middleton has expressed her desire to visit New Zealand.

Prime Minister John Key chatted with Prince William and his bride at their Buckingham Palace reception, just after they exchanged their vows in front of an audience of two billion.

In a receiving line to greet all the Prime Ministers and Governors-General of the Realm, Key chatted with the royal couple

(Excerpt) Read more at timesofindia.indiatimes.com ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: duchesofcambridge; katemiddleton; princewilliam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Perdogg

“Duchess of Cambridge ‘wants to visit New Zealand’

Why not? Since she’s now part of the richest welfare recipients in the world—you can spend other people’s money and not impact you fiscally—live it up.


21 posted on 04/30/2011 9:29:56 AM PDT by WKUHilltopper (Fix bayonets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
The Archbishop of York backed Prince William and Kate Middleton’s decision to live together before marriage, saying that many modern couples want to “test the milk before they buy the cow”.

Thanks disgusting... That being said, "Why buy the cow when the milk is free?"

22 posted on 04/30/2011 9:34:10 AM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ready4Freddy
Also Countess of Strathearn and Baroness Carrickfergus.

LOL. Seems like a tribute to Graham Chapman and the rest of Monty Python.

23 posted on 04/30/2011 9:40:16 AM PDT by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will have more quality executive experience than Barack Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
NZ ROCKS... esp. Milford Sound and Fox Glacier.

There's a great bar in Queenstown (the Remarkables mt. range is breathtaking by the way)... Bardeaux ... that's most worthy to visit on a chilly, rainy eve.

24 posted on 04/30/2011 9:42:40 AM PDT by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

Or a capitalist version: Why give away the cow when you can sell the milk for profit?


25 posted on 04/30/2011 9:44:45 AM PDT by carmody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]



You don’t have to jump through hoops
To support Free Republic


When you sign-up to be a New Monthly Donor

FReeper leapfrog0202 is donating $10 for each New Monthly Donor!!!

FReeper JustaDumbBlonde is donating $5 for each New Monthly Donor to sign-up before midnight Sunday night!!!!

Keep our Lazamataz safe!

26 posted on 04/30/2011 9:52:30 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I bet they’re going to one of the British island-nations in the Caribbean.


27 posted on 04/30/2011 11:09:59 AM PDT by SilvieWaldorfMD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
Since she’s now part of the richest welfare recipients in the world

How do you figure that?

28 posted on 04/30/2011 1:46:04 PM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WKUHilltopper
"Since she’s now part of the richest welfare recipients in the world"

I was listening to a radio program the other day and one of the people commented that the royal family owns large chunks of land throughout Britain and in London. This land generates a large amount of revenue which they apparently donate entirely to the government. In return, the gov't provides the royal family with an allowance. I think that was the gist of it; but the point was that they weren't just freeloaders.

29 posted on 04/30/2011 1:57:15 PM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jimfree

Scotland & N Ireland, respectively.


30 posted on 04/30/2011 7:34:34 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy (I fight gangs for local charities and stuff.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ripliancum
I smell a diversion to send the media scrambling elsewhere while they honeymoon in their undisclosed location.

I heard they're honeymooning in Cleveland.

31 posted on 04/30/2011 7:36:30 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Actually, she isn't Princess Catherine - just as William's mother wasn't Princess Diana. Even though the media constantly called her that (she was HRH Diana, Princess of Wales - she lost the HRH on divorce, but was allowed to keep the Princess of Wales, as mother of the future King).

Catherine is, in simple terms, Her Royal Highness, the Duchess of Cambridge. Her full title is Her Royal Highness Princess William Arthur Philip Louis, Duchess of Cambridge, Countess of Strathearn, Baroness Carrickfergus.

She isn't Princess Catherine because she isn't a Princess in her own right (Princess Anne, Princess Beatrice, and Princess Eugenie, and technically Princess Louise, are the only current Princesses in their own right in the UK). She is a Princess only because she is married to a Prince, and so she is Princess William because he is Prince William.

British titles are somewhat confusing at times.

The only exception in recent history to this rule was Princess Alice, Duchess of Gloucester - technically as she was a Princess and a Duchess only because of her marriage to Prince Henry, Duke of Gloucester, she should have been Princess Henry. But when her husband died, and her daughter-in-law became the new Duchess of Gloucester, it was considered it might cause confusion to have two Duchesses of Gloucester and so the Queen gave her permission to use the title of Princess Alice (it helped that her sister-in-law in similar circumstances, was Princess Marina, Duke of Kent - but she held that title because she was a Princess (of Greece and Denmark) in her own right.

32 posted on 06/13/2011 6:37:31 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Flag_This; WKUHilltopper
I was listening to a radio program the other day and one of the people commented that the royal family owns large chunks of land throughout Britain and in London. This land generates a large amount of revenue which they apparently donate entirely to the government. In return, the gov't provides the royal family with an allowance. I think that was the gist of it; but the point was that they weren't just freeloaders.

You are correct.

The only money that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge receive from the British taxpayer is the Duke of Cambridge's salary as a serving officer of the Royal Air Force. He is not, in any way, a welfare recipient.

He is a wealthy man - he inherited half of his mother's personal wealth which she left to him in her will. Her money came from her divorce settlement with the Prince of Wales - and his money is income from businesses that he owns, not from the British government.

The Royal Family, in general, cannot be described as welfare recipients in any sense. Most of them receive no money at all from the British government. The only exceptions are the Queen and the Duke of Edinburgh - and the money they receive is less than one tenth of the money that the Royal Family gives the British taxpayer each year - since the time of George III, the Royal Family has voluntarily ceded the income from the Crown Estate (currently about £200 million a year generated by over £6 billion pounds worth of property belonging to the Crown) to the British treasury. In exchange for this, the Treasury agrees to fund the official activities of the Royal Family which amounts to about £8 million a year. They hand over £200 million and get back about £8 million. That's not welfare.

33 posted on 06/13/2011 6:48:55 PM PDT by naturalman1975 ("America was under attack. Australia was immediately there to help." - John Winston Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: naturalman1975
"They hand over £200 million and get back about £8 million. That's not welfare."

It's just a very bad investment strategy. :)

Thank you for the details - I had no idea that they donated that amount of money.

34 posted on 06/13/2011 7:09:36 PM PDT by Flag_This (Real presidents don't bow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: null and void
,,, get a room ready?


35 posted on 06/16/2011 4:45:53 AM PDT by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson