Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SideoutFred
I’ve done my research.

Oh, okay.

a weapon that was designed solely for use by a professional soldier.

Oh, clearly you haven't. You do understand that our soldiers use full auto M-16's and that M-16's are not covered by your ban don't you? However it does cover many SEMI autos like the AR-15 which our soldiers do not use.

Oh wait, you said you have done your research and know this so you are lying?

Once again it is the Bill of Rights not the Bill of Needs.

Posting to you is like showing a chicken a card trick.

164 posted on 05/03/2011 6:02:39 AM PDT by Eaker (The problem with the internet, you're never sure of the accuracy of the quotes. Abraham Lincoln '65)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies ]


To: Eaker

LOL. First you said I’m scare of guns, yet I own a gun. You were wrong.

Now you call it “my ban”...nice.

Not my ban. You don’t need AK47’s anymore than you need a flamethrower, RPG, grenades, mines in fromt of your house or what have you.

This is purely you and others running scared that if they take “these away they’ll take them all away”. That will never happen. To many of us that have guns to let that happen. Just as there are too many people with common sense to know there is no reason to have some of these assault weapons allowed for private citizens.

Are there some guns on the list that probably shouldn’t be? Yup. That’s your argument and a valid one. But something tells me that you wouldn’t be satisfied until nothing was on the list. Maybe I’m wrong, but I doubt it.


165 posted on 05/04/2011 12:33:13 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson