Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

George Soros: Why I agree with (some of) Friedrich Hayek
Politico ^ | 04/29/2011 | George Soros

Posted on 04/29/2011 11:16:40 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2011 11:16:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

BS Alert! Soros is moving his lips again.

Yo George. You make other collaborators look like boy scouts.


2 posted on 04/29/2011 11:20:26 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Bad posters drive out good; don't post and drive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; butterdezillion

Oh, boy!

With this article George Soros has left himself open.

This explains a great deal about the man.


3 posted on 04/29/2011 11:21:39 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NOT FOREIGN NATIONALS AS OUR PRESIDENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A totally awesome video:

Fight of the Century: Keynes vs. Hayek Round Two
http://econstories.tv/2011/04/28/fight-of-the-century-music-video/


4 posted on 04/29/2011 11:23:28 AM PDT by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Kick this filth back into the gutter where his kind belong...or better yet, out of America for good.


5 posted on 04/29/2011 11:23:43 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Note to Soros: Rather than sharing your worthless opinions, would you please do all of us the favor of assuming room temperature?


6 posted on 04/29/2011 11:24:19 AM PDT by Howie66 (I can see November (2012) from my house.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
.” This is an excerpt of a speech Soros is giving at Cato Institute on Tuesday

Soros speaking at Cato? This is like Colonel Sanders addressing the chickens.

7 posted on 04/29/2011 11:24:51 AM PDT by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]



Free Republic’s Key to Success
Is Monthly Donors


Donate monthly, and a sponsoring FReeper will contribute $10
Or give what you can

Save Lazamataz! He’s fading fast!

8 posted on 04/29/2011 11:24:58 AM PDT by TheOldLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
With friends like this (would that the man's economic thinking were among the dominant teachings of economic thought in this country today), Friedrich Hayek doesn't need enemies.
9 posted on 04/29/2011 11:25:22 AM PDT by BluesDuke (Another brief interlude from the small apartment halfway up in the middle of nowhere in particular)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
No one believes a word you say, you degenerate kapo.
10 posted on 04/29/2011 11:26:02 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is a formalized and mathematical theory, whose two main pillars are the efficient market hypothesis and the theory of rational expectations.”

Um, no. It is not that. It is fundamentally an epistemological theory that starts with the axiom that man is not God.

And Hayek is distinct in many ways from the Chicago School.


11 posted on 04/29/2011 11:32:28 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NeoCaveman

This is hilarious! Telling this to economists and public policy spialists at Cato!

The first few sentences reveal that Soros hasn’t a clue. Hayek was never part of the “Chicago School”. In fact, Hayek’s views on the business cycle, money, macroeconomics, etc. were very much at variance with the Chicago School.

Hayek also never, ever advocated any form of the efficient markets hypothesis. He favored markets, but had a completely different view on why they are beneficial.

Hayek never believed that the mathematical modeling that occupies economic journals today is terribly useful. This had to do with his views on epistemology and the foundations of economics.

I could go on in this vein, but to have that self-important blimp-of-a-man, Soros, prattle on like this in front of an audience that would recognize what he has to say as an illiterate rant is profoundly amusing. Soros must have gone to Fiddler On The Roof and come away thinking that the lyrics to “If I Were a Rich Man” apply to him (”If you’re rich they think you really know”).

Unfortunately, I doubt that the Catoites had the character to laugh at Curious George.


12 posted on 04/29/2011 11:40:27 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
In the beginning of the article Soros makes several statements, which may be minor, but show his duplicity. He states that Van Hayek is Chicago School economics but most would agree he is Austrian School, an approach that is no necessarily considered highly mathematical and the biggest misstatement is that von Hayek’s economics is the most widely taught economics in the country. As an econ minor I never heard the name von Hayek. Why accept anything from Mr Soros after that start.
13 posted on 04/29/2011 11:44:07 AM PDT by cmwy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: achilles2000

Abolsutely right. Hayek couldn’t even get an appointment to the econmics department at Chicago because of opposition by the faculty. The years that he taught there he was a member of the Committee on Social Thought.


14 posted on 04/29/2011 11:58:26 AM PDT by GrootheWanderer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: businessprofessor

Ping.


15 posted on 04/29/2011 12:04:59 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Human beings act on the basis of their imperfect understanding — and their decisions have unintended consequences. That makes human affairs less predictable than natural phenomenon.

This is absolutely correct.

Where (among many others) Soros goes wrong is his inherent assumption that there is some group of superhumans we can put in charge of our economy who aren't subject to such frailty. 100 million people are less likely to be wrong, over time, than 100 people.

While the market is often wrong, it is more often right than any other mechanism we've ever come up with.

One of the things I find most fascinating is that market economics is the same idea in economics as evolution is in biology. Nobody with half a brain claims that either always reaches the "right" answer, just that it does so more often than any other mechanism.

It is also intriguing that those most likely to reject this mechanism in economics are the most attached to it in biology, while those who reject evolution in biology are often the most in favor of free markets.

16 posted on 04/29/2011 12:18:16 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Spooky dude speaks...


17 posted on 04/29/2011 12:34:16 PM PDT by CPT Clay (Pick up your weapon and follow me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

SOROS STFU.


18 posted on 04/29/2011 12:59:58 PM PDT by struggle ((The struggle continues))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

ping


19 posted on 04/29/2011 1:03:04 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cmwy

Yes, he is bananas if he thinks the Chicago school and Hayek dominate what gets taught in econ these days. I remember when I discovered Hayek and started seeking out his books. My university library had several on the shelf, but the last time they had been checked out was 15 years previous to me. So it was obvious that the professors weren’t assigning the students to read Hayek or even generating any interest in him. Meanwhile Keynes was dogeared. Soros thinking that Hayek dominates reminds me of the skewed way that liberals perceive conservative media, imagining it as a Goliath when it’s more of a David.


20 posted on 04/29/2011 1:27:31 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson