Mark was WAY, WAY off in his “analysis” of NBC law and the Constitution.
He and his caller discussed the 1790 Naturalization Act but not the 1795 Act which superceded it. They talked about English common law but not Emerich de Vattel!
Theytalked about the Ark case of 1898 which is totally inappropriate because it addresses citizenship and not NBC.
How can ANYONE talk about the Founders and NBC and not bring up de Vattel? Neither did the John Jay letter to Washington get a mention.
What we did get from Mark was a very overwrought Alinskyite rant of the type which always suggests to me that the shouter doesn’t know his subject very well.
Mark needs about 30 minutes alone with Leo D’Onofrio and he’ll change his tune pronto.
Unless he’s afraid of being shut out by yellow-streak Republicans and “bi-partisanship”-mad independents.
I was very disappointed with Mark Steyn, for his misinformation and belittling attitude.