Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin
Well, the Nordykes are the originals they got when the girls started kindergarten, so the purported one issued today would not look similar to theirs. It’s the filed/accepted dates & the number sequence discrepency that outright shows that Obama’s is a fake made out of thin air for the fraud-in-thief.

The Nordyke "originals" are exactly the same thing that Obama put out on Wednesday, that is, a copy of the original Certificate on record. The only difference, other than the content of the forms, is the signatures of the officials who authenticated the copy. In 1966, two people signed it, the Director of Health and the Registrar General. In 2011, the State Registrar signed it.

As for the document #'s, in addition to the numerous plausible explanations for the order discrepancy, Mrs Nordyke herself had her own theory. "Eleanor Nordyke told WND she thinks her twins got lower numbers because she went into the hospital Aug. 4, 1961, and was in labor for 20 hours before she delivered. She speculates that Ann Dunham came in after her and was given a later number, even though Dunham's baby was born earlier. Nordyke's twins were not born until the afternoon of the next day." Certainly plausible. As is the possibility that all the forms for the week were instead stamped with a number and filed (not the same as accepted) on the same day, and a simple clerical error ordered the forms incorrectly. There is nothing "outright" proven by the document numbers.

http://www.biasedmediaboycott.com/index.php?topic=80.0

113 posted on 04/29/2011 7:55:58 AM PDT by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Tatze
In 1961, the birth cert numbers were mechanically stamped onto the document. The numbers on those stamping machines automatically advanced each time they were used, therefore a date of accepted & signed on Aug 8 would have to have a much lower cert number than the ones dated & signed Aug 11. That is unless one is so naive to believe that there were only 2 births filed & numbered in between those dates and that somehow the “WON'S” cert got date stamped & signed by the local registrar on Aug 8, but then the registrar set it aside for a few days and didn't issue it a number until after the Nordykes certs were finalized by the registrar. I've filled out a lot of official forms & one doesn't sign off on something until all the above required information is confirmed as being a true & correct compilation of the facts of which the document pertains to.

The only other plausible conclusions is that the “WON’s” cert was filed at a satellite office, but it didn't receive it's number until it reached the main office in Honolulu some days later. Therefore, since the Nordykes show the name of a different local registrar, Lee must have worked at the satellite office certain days of the week and worked in the main office the rest, where there were several local registrars on hand handling these documents and once the docs were finalized & signed by the registrars, they then would walk over to the machine & give them their automatically determined official mechanically machined certificate number...seen it done many a times. There is only 1 official State Registrar, but many local ones to handle the work load as the State Registrar's signature only applies when one requests a true & correct copy of the original.

Or maybe the moon is really made of green cheese...take your pick.

116 posted on 04/29/2011 8:37:19 AM PDT by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson