Any examination of the purported “evidence” will show Calvin was both loved and hated, with good reason for both, but the charge of being caught in an act of sodomy is just an attempt to slander an enemy.
Honesty is honesty...even for those we disagree with.
Whatever happened to *Innocent until proved guilty*?
Or is that only for pedophile Catholic priests?
Catholics, to avoid being hypocrites, need to hold themselves to the level of proof required by them to condemn a priest.
If they're going to smear Calvin like that, they need PROOF and it's up to them to present it to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, because I'm sure some Catholic is going to come along and claim that Calvin is guilty by default and it's up to someone else to prove he wasn't.
Proof from the Catholics, not hearsay, or innuendo, but facts, like the kind they demand before condemning their own priests (who Catholics will not admit as being guilty even when the priest ADMITS to the crime)
Double standards = hypocrisy.