Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AuH2ORepublican

I still think had TR not run in 1912, Taft still might very well have lost (not by much, however). I base that on the fact that the Republicans lost the House in the 1910 midterms and were effectively split in the Senate (which led to the infamous turnover of Presidents Pro Tempore). I think a lot of the Roosevelt Progressives would’ve voted for Wilson in protest.


12 posted on 05/08/2011 9:43:05 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Amber Lamps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

My Grandfather hated TR, The Bride at every Wedding and the corpse at every funeral, hated FDR even more.


14 posted on 05/08/2011 10:09:03 AM PDT by Little Bill (Sorry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: fieldmarshaldj

No doubt about it. Taft was the precursor of Hoover twenty years earlier.


18 posted on 05/08/2011 3:33:06 PM PDT by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson