Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: stockpirate
the date 1961 has been altered, the 1 is not the same inking device as the rest of the number. It appears to have been hand written

It's plausible to me that the stamp only had the first three digits of the year and the last digit had to be written in. It would be a way to make the stamp last longer. It had rotating sections for the month, the two digits of the day and for the year. So they could get one for the 1960's (1960-1969), or they could get one for the 20th century or some period longer than 10 years (195-199). Just a thought.

50 posted on 04/27/2011 11:03:46 AM PDT by Tatze (I reject your reality and substitute my own!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Tatze

Boys, it’s real. We win on issues...not this wacky sh*t.


70 posted on 04/27/2011 11:36:02 AM PDT by maineman (BC EAGLES FAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: Tatze

How does this compare 1961 date to the other person’s birth certificate that we have as an example, the person that was born after obamma? Does that birth certificate indicate the last digit of the year 1961 appear to be handwritten in?


74 posted on 04/27/2011 11:44:40 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson