that digitally composited view would be strongly confirmed if there were any pixels of green security background that could be found in one of the component pieces that were clearly overlapped by something else in in one of the other component pieces—such that by hiding an upper element, we can see more green background pixels being revealed.
I just looked for this and didn't see it. It wouldn't be there unless we have the original layers. This would happen if the digital composite was flattened and the layers we see are created by Illustrator and don't correspond. (When I turn off the bkgnd layer some other elements go with it.)
This adds a bit of oddity… since a person was sent to "pick up" the certificate.
Good point. That could be explained this way: HI *did* print out the digital composite. The WH scanned the printout to the PDF we have.
I have appreciated your careful analysis. I do not have a stake in faked or not faked, myself. I just feel like any question anyone wants to ask is fair game since Obama has manufactured this ball of wax for himself.
In light of that, to your knowledge related to computer generated images and such, does the term TXE have any meaning?
I am a complete computer dummy and not afraid to admit it. But I ask you this because I made this observation on another thread. Please feel free to have a hearty laugh on my behalf if it so warrants. But after that, could you please tell me why I am wrong? Thanks in advance.
post from #1454
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2711155/posts?q=1&;page=1451
This is what Hawaii says:
“Original forms from the time of birth are used to produce computer-generated documents recognized as official birth certificates in the state of Hawaii.”
As Clinton says, this is a case of knowing which meaning of “is” we are talking about.
Notice the plural use of the word “form” — forms—
Notice the use of the word FROM, consider it in the sense of a sale at a store with items FROM $7.99. There is more after that FROM.
Now notice these words, “produce computer-generated documents”
They have honestly said exactly what has transpired.
And here is where I think they covered their tracks to keep from getting into legal trouble:
The TXE is no mistake or blurring. It is intentional. TXE is a file extension associated with Enriched Text files. (I picked up this definition from here:
http://www.liutilities.com/products/winbackup/filextlibrary/files/TXE/
Enriched text is a formatted text format for e-mail, defined by the IETF in RFC 1896 and associated with the text/enriched MIME type. It is “intended to facilitate the wider interoperation of simple enriched text across a wide variety of hardware and software platforms”.
That definition from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enriched_text
The following post asks the perfectly right on question:
#1406 asks shouldn’t these match?
And this post really shows some clear information:
#1426 Notice the pixelation surrounding the center line text that does not appear around the text in similar letters in the same stamp in the text above and below the center line.
Here is what I am saying....I may not be specifically on to what they meant by “TXE” but I believe they meant to say “TXE” and I am pretty sure what they are really and truly saying is that what we are seeing is an ABSTRACT (translate compilation) of all the “original forms” (translate ammendments, etc.) -—FROM-— BHO’s time of birth [-—to present-—] put together in digital form ie. “computer-generated documents.”