Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
So cut and run thinks abortion is ok in some instances, but he is against them in other instances.
133 posted on 04/28/2011 3:08:34 PM PDT by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]


To: John D
RE :”So cut and run thinks abortion is ok in some instances, but he is against them in other instances.

The constitution says the states have the power to outlaw abortion, not the Federal government.

Your position opposing that is to throw the constitution in the garbage when Republicans are in power, pass anything that suits your position and make believe an Obama will never get elected and use the Federal power precedents against us. Then throw the word 'constitution' around when a Democrat is in power after you used it as toilet paper.

Guess who else agrees with me and Palin? Scalia and Thomas. But you dont care, you just want Republican Kings ruling the country in your imaginary world.

147 posted on 04/28/2011 6:46:51 PM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

To: John D; jpsb; rabscuttle385; Bokababe; calcowgirl; DoughtyOne; mkjessup; Gilbo_3; NFHale; Impy; ...
RE :”So cut and run thinks abortion is ok in some instances

Maybe you think these two 'thinks abortion is ok in some instances' :?

Justices Thomas and Scalia might have voted to strike down the (Federal Partial Birth abortion ) law had a Commerce Clause objection been raised. It's possible that this law will be revisited and a different result obtained. “ Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia, wrote an interesting concurrence in yesterday's partial birth abortion case, indicating that he might be sympathetic to a Commerce Clause challenge to the federal partial birth abortion ban that was just upheld by the Court.” But no one — perhaps fortunately — raised the Commerce Clause, ...
ref at Catholic Answers Forums

And don't try your “ Scalia and Thomas want to kill babies“ crap, it wont fly!

You make it clear that you think the US constitution is just a document that means nothing, unlike Scalia and Thomas. You know who agreed with you? pissant!

151 posted on 04/28/2011 7:22:34 PM PDT by sickoflibs ("It's not the taxes, the redistribution is the federal spending=tax delayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson