Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SonsOfLibertyII

I am a bit into handwriting analysis, someone more proficient should have the last word.........BUT......

Check out the (Stanley) Anne Dunham’s signature and compare the critical elements with the witness signature.

1-IDENTICAL slant to the right. Damn-near impossible for this to occur with any two signers. (PS-they’re both OPTIMISTS by nature).

2-The lower-case “m” in the attendant’s signature (David A. Smilar?) is a match to the “m” in Anne Dunham Obama’s signature, particularly in the last name.

3-The loops in both samples share the same widths as relates to the letter sizes. Anne Dunham Obama’s signature is written in a smaller space and fills that space in the same proportion as the signer below, not atypical for the same signers to write larger or smaller depending on the available space to sign. It is obvious that the Ann Dunham signature was done slowly and with utmost care, while the attendant signed larger and faster, an attempt to disguise? But to me the giveaway is the slant.

4-The dates on the right share again identical slant and the eights are once again, in my view, from the same hand.

I can only say that if I were going to forge a document, I would want as few in on the scam as possible, so I wouldn’t consider it “dumb” to have someone forge both signatures.

I’m probably wrong, because I don’t have examples of Anne Dunham Obama’s handwriting, this could be her signature, what intrigues me so is the identical slant and lettering of both signatures. I hope there’s a real handwriting expert on this forum that could evaluate the evidence and set me straight, I just don’t trust these people.


50 posted on 04/27/2011 7:52:45 AM PDT by wayoverontheright (The Democratic Party is trying to end "the private sector as we know it".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: wayoverontheright

I just compared the mother’s signature from the Sorento’s divorce documents to the signature here and “Dunham” is in no way signed the same way.


99 posted on 04/27/2011 8:42:50 AM PDT by fishinnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

To: wayoverontheright

The doctor’s name on this latest document looks like it may be SINCLAIR.

The number on the Certification of Live Birth has been obscured. That number may be the fly in the ointment, since it would be very risky to fake that. The number must be a reasonable match for the date and, since the numbers are sequential, you can’t just make one up. If you do, someone living now may very well come forward with the same number. What is the official explanation for hiding the certification number?


107 posted on 04/27/2011 8:52:29 AM PDT by July4 (Remember the price paid for your freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson