Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Para-Ord.45

Sure. That and then some:

I believe the Constitution does not define the term “natural born Citizen.”

I believe we need a definitive ruling from the SCOTUS on the definition of “natural born Citizen.”

I believe that the FF intended “natural born Citizen” to mean a child born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen parents.

I don’t believe we’ll ever get a ruling on Obama’s NBC status while he’s in office.

I would accept a ruling from the SCOTUS that said Obama is a natural born Citizen.

Was that what you wanted? Did I leave out anything?


912 posted on 04/27/2011 10:36:01 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. *4192*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 877 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
I believe that the FF intended “natural born Citizen” to mean a child born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen parents.

That's the crux of the issue. I too feel that was their intent. I hope SCOTUS rules on that once and for all and the states keep pursuing the eligibility bills so this mess doesn't happen down the road.

940 posted on 04/27/2011 10:56:26 AM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 912 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson