You have just called me a liar but posted no link and quoted no document to prove your charge. Prove your claim that Arthur implied ANYTHING about his father's citizenship. Arthur never said anything about his fathers's citizenship!
Oh...don't give me that non-argumetn that he was off a few years in his father's age or immigration date since that has NO bearing on the citizenship issue one way or the other. Here is where we stand: Arthur never denied that his father was foreign born and NOBODY, not even his worst critics, bothered to look into the issue. BTW, even if you were right (AND YOU'RE NOT) there was nothing to stop Americans from at least asking the question....that is if they cared!
It certainly does. One had to be resident for x number of years before naturalization. Arthur lied about the dates so as to imply he was resident a sufficient amount of time to be naturalized.
Please stop posting lies to FreeRepulic.com .