So in your mind the opinion of ONE congressman in 1862 trumps established law that has been upheld by SCOTUS?
Really?
Show me a link to the law established by SCOTUS that defines a ‘natural born citizen’ to be a child born of only ONE citizen parent, as it applies to eligibility for the office of President.
And if you side Dred Scott v Sandford, that decision only applies to anyone born within the U.S. as being defined as a ‘native’ born citizen. That doesn’t make them eligible to be President.
Same applies for United States vs Wong Kim Ark.
So show me the link that says any person born in the U.S. is eligible to be President.