Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FourtySeven; Pyro7480; danamco; Mr Rogers
The 1844 case of Lynch v. Clarke heard in the first curcuit court of New York found defendant Julia Lynch, who was born in New York city in 1819, to alien parents, to be a "citizen."

This is exactly what the WKA court rulled Mr. Ark to be. A "citizen." Something the recent state of Indiana court found to be a fact.

In both cases, neither was found to be a "natural born Citizen."

In fact, the article in which this information comes from: "The New York Legal Observer" Edited by Samuel Owen, we see mention of Vattel and his authority on citizenship and that "the rule of Vattel, is controlled by the intention with which the father takes up his abode in the foreign country."

Barry's father, Sr. was here on a student visa. A temporary visitor. He had zero intention of making the U.S. his perminant abode (or domocile). He had every intention of going back to Kenya with his American education in an attempt to be a power player in Kenyan economics.

1,185 posted on 04/27/2011 2:05:03 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1004 | View Replies ]


To: rxsid

Lynch was found to be a natural born citizen.

“6. Upon principle, therefore, I can entertain no doubt, but that by the law of the United States, every person born within the dominions and allegiance of the United States, whatever were the situation of his parents, is a natural born citizen.”

But if you could read, you wouldn’t be a birther.

The court in WKA showed WKA qualified as a NBC to show why, in part, he was a citizen IAW the Constitution.

Obama Sr, like the Lynchs, was not here permanently. Unlike the Lynchs, he abandoned his child and left him to be raised in the USA, but Lynch was still a NBC - and so is Barry. And the court in Indiana found the same.

As will any other court, and for the same reason. Which is why no state denied Obama a spot on the ballot, and why his opponents didn’t protest his running, and why no Congressman raised an objection and why no court will throw him out.

Not because of a Vast Left Wing Conspiracy, but because it is established law. Unchallenged at least since 1844...


1,251 posted on 04/27/2011 3:31:35 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Poor history is better than good fiction, and anything with lots of horses is better still)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1185 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson