Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OldNewYork

There is no possibility of reasoning with the Paul haters here. He isn’t the perfect candidate or conservative, but has far more virtues than liabilities. He isn’t going to get the nomination - it is inconceivable short of hyperinflation. Nevertheless, he helps by educating younger voters about fiscal, tax, and monetary issues. That is more than I can say about anyone else running. I think the main problem now is that there is no really strong candidate in sight, but it is still early.


40 posted on 04/26/2011 8:34:05 PM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: achilles2000

I liked Rand for president in 2012 because he was aggressive, though well-spoken enough he could do it without being caustic, beyond supporting his views. I think, unless someone in the regular Republican camp steps it up soon, things could go Mr. Trump’s way because he’s the most outspoken, the most able and willing to take it right to the incumbent and the source of the problem, even if what he sees as the problem doesn’t coincide perfectly with many conservatives. But you’re right, it is early days. In any event, I think Ron Paul and Donald Trump are good for the national debate by being involved.


41 posted on 04/26/2011 8:58:10 PM PDT by OldNewYork (social justice isn't justice; it's just socialism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson