[giotto]

Sorry, I can no longer take this woman seriously. I watched about 30 seconds of her appearance on Greta's show, and she blew it with the first sentence I heard. Asked about Libya, she said, that if we're in it, we should be in it to win it. That means getting Gadaffi out of power, which means we should go at it with all possible means.

There was no questioning of whether or not we should be there at all, or whether we had any right or justification for removing Gadaffi.

My apologies if she did later on say those things.

[filbert]

Sorry, I can no longer take this woman seriously. I watched about 30 seconds of her appearance on Greta's show, and she blew it with the first sentence I heard. Asked about Libya, she said, that if we're in it, we should be in it to win it. That means getting Gadaffi out of power, which means we should go at it with all possible means.

There was no questioning of whether or not we should be there at all, or whether we had any right or justification for removing Gadaffi.

My apologies if she did later on say those things.

From Palin's Facebook post:

If Gaddafi’s got to go, then tell NATO our continued participation hinges on this: We strike hard and Gaddafi will be gone. If, as you and your spokesmen suggest, we’re not to tell Libya what to do when it comes to that country’s leadership, and if you can’t explain to Americans why we’re willing to protect Libyan resources and civilians but not Syria’s, Yemen’s, Bahrain’s, Egypt’s, Israel’s, etc., then there is no justification for U.S. human and fiscal resources to be spent.

Not hard to find. The link is, I think, upthread.