To: dfwgator
“1. Who gets to define what constitutes “pornography”?”
It is not that difficult, really. If it depicts a sex act, it’s pornography.
8 posted on
04/26/2011 1:26:09 PM PDT by
DonaldC
(A nation cannot stand in the absence of religious principle.)
To: DonaldC
If it depicts a sex act, it’s pornography Well, that's your definition of pornography. The problem with regulating it is everyone's got a different definition.
14 posted on
04/26/2011 1:29:02 PM PDT by
gdani
To: DonaldC
“If it depicts a sex act, it’s pornography.”
Wow, I had no idea that “Black Swan” or “300” was pornography!
36 posted on
04/26/2011 1:47:41 PM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
To: DonaldC
This could get into many grey areas. What about 2 people “between the sheets” in an R-rated movie? I am pretty sure they are depicting a sex act. Does that make it pornography?
43 posted on
04/26/2011 1:56:51 PM PDT by
NEMDF
To: DonaldC
It is not that difficult, really. If it depicts a sex act, it’s pornography.
So, if the nekkid woman is standing there and posing for the camera, that's just erotica?
Changing our culture to "convert" muzzies strikes me as a monumental waste of time and effort. We'd be better off just turning them in self-destructive hypocrites with the porn industry as is.
Muzzies don't even need the pretext to go about separating Christian souls from their mortal selves. Rather than lament the porn industry's rise, get a rifle and learn how to use it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson