Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Raytheon delivers first of ship-defense missiles
Arizona Daily Star ^ | April 26, 2011 | David Wichner

Posted on 04/26/2011 8:18:50 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Raytheon delivers first of ship-defense missiles

David Wichner Arizona Daily Star

Arizona Daily Star | Posted: Tuesday, April 26, 2011

12:00 am | Comments

Tucson-based Raytheon Missile Systems has delivered the first production copy of its next ship-defense missile to the U.S. Navy for final testing.

The first Standard Missile-6, a longer-range version of the Standard Missile-2 series of ship-defense weapons, was delivered on time and on budget in March after five years of development, the company said Monday.

The first SM-6 was delivered after final assembly at the company's plant in Camden, Ark. The weapon will undergo operational testing this summer, one of the last steps before a decision to deploy the SM-6 on Navy ships, said Frank Wyatt, vice president of Raytheon's air and missile defense systems product line.

The first missile is part of an initial batch of 89 missiles Raytheon is producing under a three-year, $368 million contract for low-rate initial production awarded last year.

The latest in the Standard Missile series of ship-defense missiles first developed in the 1960s, the SM-6 adds a rocket booster for extended range as well as onboard "active" radar-targeting adapted from Raytheon's Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM).

Like prior SM-2 versions, the SM-6 also can be guided by semi-active radar, which uses the firing ship's sensors for targeting.

The active radar enables the SM-6 to detect and track targets itself "over the horizon," out of reach of the firing ship's sensors.

"It gives them this anti-air warfare capability beyond the horizon of the ship, so you're not limited by what the radar on the (firing) ships see," Wyatt said. "It literally advances the defended footprint around the ship, and in the future you can get into areas called integrated fire control, where you have other sensors cueing the ship to extend its footprint as well."

The use of the AMRAAM active-radar sensor was a cost-effective, timely way to get the SM-6 to the Navy on time and on cost, Wyatt added.

Unit cost figures on the SM-6 were not immediately available.

The range of the supersonic SM-6 is classified but is substantially longer than SM-2's official range of about 90 nautical miles, Wyatt said.

Contact Assistant Business Editor David Wichner at dwichner@azstarnet.com or 573-4181.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aerospace; raytheon; sm6; usn

1 posted on 04/26/2011 8:18:54 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Thanks for posting this, sukoi-30mki.


2 posted on 04/26/2011 8:25:50 AM PDT by unkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s still a grown-up Terrier missile to me.


3 posted on 04/26/2011 8:37:21 AM PDT by Thrownatbirth (.....Iraq Invasion fan since '91.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

This seems like an effort to extend the defense of the fleet against Sunburn-type missiles. I wonder if it has any capability against the new Chicom anti-ship ballistic missile. I still wish the Navy had further developed the Phoenix missile concept as well. A fighter aircraft armed with a long-range missile with an active seeker is still going to have greater range than any shipboard weapon.


4 posted on 04/26/2011 9:02:14 AM PDT by LSUfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Ship fired missiles are so yesterday.


5 posted on 04/26/2011 9:04:37 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
This seems like an effort to extend the defense of the fleet against Sunburn-type missiles. I wonder if it has any capability against the new Chicom anti-ship ballistic missile. I still wish the Navy had further developed the Phoenix missile concept as well. A fighter aircraft armed with a long-range missile with an active seeker is still going to have greater range than any shipboard weapon.


The AMRAAM seeker head in the SM-6 does have an active seeker for the terminal phase

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AIM-120_AMRAAM

Seems like a good mix-n-match of existing technology.

6 posted on 04/26/2011 9:10:53 AM PDT by az_gila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan
Don't let the "Use against Somali Pirates" propaganda fool you.

The real reason isn't go up against a boat that a Browning 50 Cal could take care of, it is meant to shoot down incoming missiles, Like the Chicom/Bill Clinton ones.

7 posted on 04/26/2011 9:12:34 AM PDT by KC_Lion (America IS at War with itself, and no one seems to notice or care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LSUfan

The main USN weapon against ballistic missiles will remain the SM-3 missile with the SM-2 and SM-6 providing last ditching terminal interception.


8 posted on 04/26/2011 12:30:19 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson