The stat I’m not seeing is the percentages of cases in which one or more humans die.
Insurance underwriters.
Cases of what?
I asked if you have scientific evidence that pits are more dangerous than other dogs. You haven't shown me any. Got any?
I asked if we should ban other breeds because the owners almost certainly don't use them for what they were bred for. you didn't answer that question either.
If you're going to advocate an intrusion on property rights, you need to have something more solid to defend that position than searching your feelings like Luke Skywalker. So, please answer my questions.
Here is the latest from the CDC:
The latest CDC "Dog Bite: Fact Sheet" includes a disclaimer regarding this study, saying that
"it does not identify specific breeds that are most likely to bite or kill, and thus is not appropriate for policy-making decisions related to the topic. Each year, 4.7 million Americans are bitten by dogs. These bites result in approximately 16 fatalities; about 0.0002 percent of the total number of people bitten. These relatively few fatalities offer the only available information about breeds involved in dog bites. There is currently no accurate way to identify the number of dogs of a particular breed, and consequently no measure to determine which breeds are more likely to bite or kill."[40]
So, shall we kill or otherwise get rid of all of one breed based on a media bias against them?