[Cicero]

Interesting pictures AP chose for these two contenders. Any bias there, ya think?

[Christian Engineer Mass]

“Any bias there, ya think?”

I lold.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Naaaah. None. (HUGE sarcasm)

[Rennes Templar]

An intersting study would be AP compilations of GOP vs Dim
news photos.

[vaudine]

Bias? You bet. They always showed bad pics of the Bushes.They are so petty in trying to portray Republicans in a bad light, it even extended to the Smithsonian, where they displayed Laura Bush's inauguration gown off in a corner by itself. The other first ladies' gowns were displayed on mannequins, Hillary's nipped in to fit the mannequin and made her look small and trim-LOL! Laura Bush's was long sleeved, and they displayed it on only a partial mannequin--the body like a sewing dummy with no arms. It was puckered on the upper body, like it was ill fitting, and the arms were stuffed with something like straw that made them huge and floppy and grotesque looking. I was so disgusted at the obvious pettiness.

A funny thing about their pictures of Palin, though. I am sure they tried and tried, but they never did get a bad picture of her, no matter the angle. She is a lot like the cameramen used to say about Liz Taylor--you could not get a bad shot of her--just beautiful and photogenic.

vaudin

[stevio]

Nah, those pictures are purely coincidental. MSM sucks.

I give it to Trump, he keeps hammering. Got guts going against The Machine.

[mickie]

"Interesting pictures AP chose for these two contenders. Any bias there, ya think?"

LMAO.....thats a riot.