“But you can’t logically blame the individual that uses the lady’s room as he is told to do so.”
So, the relevant test for whether an action is to be tolerated is whether the government tells you to do it? There’s a lot of trouble down that road.
Well yes, as a matter of fact that is the primary relevant test. If you violate the rules that the government makes you go to jail or get fined.
If you voilate the rules that the church holds, or tradition suggests, usually you just get dirty looks or comments.
If, in fact, this beating had as a major cause the fact that the tranny was in the girls room then in this case it didn't work out that way. But still, the rule holds: we are supposed to follow the governments rules.
There is a lot of trouble down that road because the government has moved from being a supporter of the consensus reality and received tradition (mostly based on our Judeo-Christian heritage) into being agents of aggressive social change.
The resulting social chaos is well demonstrated in this event.
Regardless of the actions of the tranny I still say the beating was way, way, way over the top. You can't almost kill people who go in the wrong restroom. (He was clearly NOT a threat to them, there were no kids in there, he is post-op meaning he couldn't expose his male parts cause he doesn't have them, etc.)
The desire of some that post-op transexuals use the appropriate bathroom as if they are still their birth sex flies in the face of what "the rules" are. (And could also result in awkward situations like where a female-> male tranny went into the ladies room. I suspect the same poeple who are suggesting that this boy/girl use the mens room would not be real happy with a girl/boy using the girls room.
Regardless, I don't give the girls in this any kind of a pass. They behaved like animals and deserve a long sentence for their crimes.