Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Americanexpat

“Back in those days 1967 - 1969 the anti war attitudes and the local hostility to the military was rwally bad. We were there to protect the GIs.”

I can see the logic and reason in having “courtesy patrols” to deal with drunken soldiers, etc. But wouldn’t protecting them from the hostile locals be a civilian police matter? Unless you mean just keeping the guy’s in the “soldier” bars and not having their rowdiness spill out into more civilian areas.


49 posted on 04/25/2011 3:05:49 PM PDT by 21twelve ( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: 21twelve
In those days we had to protect the soldiers from the police too. The treatment of the soldiers at Ft. Jackson was so bad that the Commanding general placed the town off limits and threatened to bring families on base to live in tent cities. Once there was a negative effect on the local economy the community leaders were ready to help us control the abuses.
50 posted on 04/25/2011 3:12:48 PM PDT by Americanexpat (Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson