To: Americanexpat
“Back in those days 1967 - 1969 the anti war attitudes and the local hostility to the military was rwally bad. We were there to protect the GIs.”
I can see the logic and reason in having “courtesy patrols” to deal with drunken soldiers, etc. But wouldn’t protecting them from the hostile locals be a civilian police matter? Unless you mean just keeping the guy’s in the “soldier” bars and not having their rowdiness spill out into more civilian areas.
49 posted on
04/25/2011 3:05:49 PM PDT by
21twelve
( You can go from boom to bust, from dreams to a bowl of dust ... another lost generation.)
To: 21twelve
In those days we had to protect the soldiers from the police too. The treatment of the soldiers at Ft. Jackson was so bad that the Commanding general placed the town off limits and threatened to bring families on base to live in tent cities. Once there was a negative effect on the local economy the community leaders were ready to help us control the abuses.
50 posted on
04/25/2011 3:12:48 PM PDT by
Americanexpat
(Everytime I see that guy's face ot)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson