To: Veristhorne
Perhaps “those in the know” are asking for the b.c. Because “daddy” ain’t daddy. If Frank Davis is listed as “daddy” then he is eligible. Maybe this was the discovery that led Zero to change his mind about his OWN eligibility. It seems in 2004 even HE recognized he wasn’t.
Now this would mean he IS eligible I suppose but then we get to biological vs paternal role and Lolo, etc. Folks would also want to know just who is this Frank Davis and that would open a can of worms Zero really doesn’t want to deal with.
9 posted on
04/25/2011 3:19:24 AM PDT by
wastoute
(Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
To: wastoute
Jack Cahill's 'Deconstructing Obama' tells all about FMD. The Dunhams were Unitarian Communists. Obama was never baptized and is a true believer moslem. That's all anyone needs to know about who and what he is.
It is illegal to stand up to Islam now, so we are doomed to watch the left advance and parry while we feint and cry foul.
11 posted on
04/25/2011 3:30:14 AM PDT by
x_plus_one
(Q:How many middle class debt slaves does it take to pay for Obama care? A: All of them)
To: wastoute
Nope, still wouldn't be eligible no matter who is listed as the father.
Zippo’s parents divorce proceedings established the Kenyan as the father.
20 posted on
04/25/2011 4:58:02 AM PDT by
IMR 4350
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson