Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Springfield Reformer
As one who has sworn an oath to uphold the Constitution, I am willing to take on both fronts. Why aren’t you? Because you’ve been cowed by Rove and the leftists into believing that a real conservative can’t win this election? So it’s OK to trash the part of the Constitution that doesn’t concern you?

When I became a U.S. citizen, I had to learn the basic of the Constitution before I could take an Oath to uphold it, and I'm very much in doubt that the criminal or the p-Resident has ever done the same, before he botched it on January 20 & 21, 2009!!!

Here's my reason that I agree with Donald Trump who is doing a job (could be perceived as an illegal alien(?) LOL) that "other" American s have refused to take on???

7. Taitz has presented evidence and court documents to House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX-21), House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA-49), Rep. Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA-46), and Rep. Tom McClintock (R-CA-4), among others who have thus far failed to hold hearings, subpoena Obama's long-form birth certificate, subpoena documents regarding his links to 39 social security numbers, subpoena his college records which Taitz has asserted contain fraudulent information, and subpoena documents related to whether he is a natural born citizen. The congressional cover-up and failure to investigate Dr. Taitz's meritorious evidence raises serious questions as to whether members of congress may have been threatened or even blackmailed by the White House.

29 posted on 04/25/2011 12:16:40 PM PDT by danamco (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: danamco

Well, look. You’re skeptical of attorneys, and well you should be. They have been trained perversely by our law schools (and I can get specific if you like), with disastrous results for our political system. However, I’m a Christian attorney. I received my legal training at Liberty University, which was strongly grounded in the principles of moral and ethical truth as the foundation for law. I believe in that. But I also know what it takes to win a legal fight. So I fight only for good causes, and will not work for what is wrong.

But neither would I tell a client to fight a battle they had no power to win, even if their cause was just. You have to work with what you have. Orly is doing a good thing, and all the eligibility researchers are doing the right thing by keeping up the attack. Truth is good. But the reality is our system will not eject this man from the White House until we have the numbers and the players to do it. The cancer is too deeply embedded. Obama is acting as a dictator. He will ignore whatever the judiciary does and will claim immunity while in office even against felony charges. Even if the House voted to impeach him, the Senate will never convict him because too many of them have been complicit in the fraud. I believe this was always a part of the strategy. Our opponents are skilled tacticians. Apart from a miracle, it ain’t gonna happen that way, and no amount of good news from Orly or Corsi or Trump’s investigators is going to change that.

We have to win those 2012 elections, with people who will support our cause, or we will never get rid of him and his “transformative” experiment on us. That’s the simple truth. And we will not win anything real if we end up replacing one leftist with another leftist, just because the second leftist is really good at attacking the first leftist. Can you see how that just doesn’t make sense?


31 posted on 04/25/2011 11:24:11 PM PDT by Springfield Reformer (Winston Churchill: No Peace Till Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson