While I support Palin, my point is that Romney is worse than Trump. Romney has used the jack boot of government to implement a health care scheme where millions of people became a victim. Trump’s actions affected how many again? And Romney is a willing socialist who is completely blind to the damage he has caused. Which is worse? The health care scheme is far worse. At least Trump will admit that his actions affected various individuals ( a few, how many?) and he freely discusses the actions he took rationally with interviewers. Romney never enters the rational discussion with anyone.
Mark Steyn and Mark Levin are contributors to NRO, who are not to be grouped with the others.
I do not misuse the word RINO as you have implied. Rush and Levin have both noted how the National Review has gone downhill since the days of William Buckley. The content in the National Review at best provides a schizophrenic representation of conservativism.
Only if you allow it to be so. That's a lazy broad brush that you are painting with. If articles by Malkin, McCarthy, Steyn, Levin, Hanson, Nordlinger .... are good conservative thought, you don't want them posted and discussed on FR merely because they are on NR? Got it.
I will agree that NRO has gone downhill and that little boy Richie L has nowhere near the real world experience to run it. Folks in the know tell me that appointment was borne of WFBs heavy dope smoking in his waning years. Who knows?
I’ll disagree that Mitt is worse than Trump from a conservative point of view, but that’s a fair debate and they both raise red flags for me. I’m sure that will be part of the debate in the coming months.
My only point was that the eminent domain issue and Trump is a matter of history, and not opinion. Sure NRO may have ulterior motives, but that should not disqualify the info if it is correct. And here it is. BTW I support Cain but would vote for Palin (like you) or Trump or Mitt over a socialist idiot.